Sep 2026· The Aging Male· Vol 29 1, pp.
2724617
· 0 citations· 26 references
Medicine
TL;DR
The RSF model provides accurate, robust, and interpretable prognostication for N1M0 prostate cancer, and enables precise risk stratification and individualized treatment planning as a web-based calculator.
Abstract
Background
Prostate cancer with regional lymph node involvement but no distant metastasis (N1M0) has heterogeneous prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS).
Methods
Data from 18,287 N1M0 patients (2000-2022) in the SEER database were divided into training (n = 4780), internal testing (n = 1193), and two temporal validation cohorts (n = 3149; n = 9165). Cox proportional hazards and four machine learning models were compared using C-index, time-dependent AUC, and Integrated Brier Score. SHAP was used for interpretability, and IPTW for sensitivity analysis.
Results
Random Survival Forest (RSF) outperformed all models, achieving the highest C-index (0.697 internal; 0.740 temporal validation). RSF-stratified risk groups showed significant survival differences (P < 0.001). SHAP revealed radical prostatectomy as the strongest protective factor, followed by lower T stage and PSA. IPTW confirmed survival benefits of aggressive local control. CSS outperformed overall survival in discriminative accuracy.
Conclusion
The RSF model provides accurate, robust, and interpretable prognostication for N1M0 prostate cancer. Deployed as a web-based calculator, it enables precise risk stratification and individualized treatment planning.
Highlights • Developed nomograms predicting OS and CSS in LN-negative pancreatic cancer.• The Fine‑Gray model improved accuracy of cancer-specific survival estimates.• Nomograms integrated key clinicopathological factors with high predictive accuracy.• An online calculator enables individualized prognosis assessment in...
Zhe-Yuan Wang, Lu Zhang, Zeng-You Li et al.· Clinics· 0 citations
Men with de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) face a poor but heterogeneous prognosis, yet interpretable, transparently reported diagnostic-time tools remain limited. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17-registry database (2010–2020), we developed and temporally validated machine-learnin...
Xin Wang, Guang-Lei Yao, He-Qian Liu et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
The widespread adoption of contemporary human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapies has altered survival in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, potentially limiting the applicability of older prognostic models. We aimed to develop and internally validate nomograms for overall survival (OS) an...
Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with significant heterogeneity in postoperative outcomes among patients. Accurate prognostic prediction is essential for individualized treatment and surveillance strategies. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning-bas...
Jun Wu, Lu-Qing Zhou, Hai-Di Chang et al.· BMC Cancer· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the performance and interpretability of multiple ML algorithms for survival prediction in prostate cancer (CaP) and to assess whether these approaches can improve upon established clinical risk prediction models.
METHODS
Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 17 Database, w...
Isaac E. Kim, Cecile P. G. Meier-Scherling, S. Zhou et al.· Urologic oncology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.