Skip to content
Review

Operationalizing the EU AI Act in Agile Software Development: A Guideline-Based Approach

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 26 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

An evaluated guideline that operationalizes EU AI Act obligations as activities integrable into existing agile practice is provided: an evaluated guideline that operationalizes EU AI Act obligations as activities integrable into existing agile practice.

Abstract

Context: The EU AI Act requires providers and deployers of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to implement documentation, risk management, and human oversight. Agile teams that ship AI features in short iterations lack specific artifacts to discharge these duties, since the regulation's abstract provisions do not map onto the Definition of Done, Sprint Reviews, or working agreements. Objective: We provide agile teams with an actionable compliance instrument: an evaluated guideline that operationalizes EU AI Act obligations as activities integrable into existing agile practice. We further document the translation method behind it so that the approach can be reused for adjacent regulations. Method: Following Design Science Research, we assessed each EU AI Act article along three dimensions. We subsequently classified the articles using a traffic-light scheme and mapped those deemed highly relevant to previously documented pain points of agile teams working with AI. We validated the resulting catalog with practitioners through a survey and 11 additional semi-structured expert interviews, analyzed via qualitative content analysis. Results: The guideline comprises 12 items covering roles and responsibilities, risk and quality management, transparency and traceability, monitoring, and regulatory sandboxes. Practitioners rated the catalog as understandable and relevant; feasibility varied with organizational maturity. Effective adoption towards EU AI Act compliance requires collective ownership across roles and integration into existing agile events rather than parallel compliance processes. Conclusions: The catalog gives agile teams a starting point to transform their delivery practices towards an EU AI Act compliance without dismantling agile practices.

View source

Similar papers

Review

Development Activities: Perspectives of Agile Practitioners

This study investigates Agile practitioners’ perceptions of collaborating with GenAI in software development activities and findings advance the understanding of human-AI collaboration in Agile settings and can guide both future research and the practical adoption of GenAI in Agile environments.

Daniel Planötscher, Xiaofeng Wang, Mahum Adil et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An Essence-Based Software Development Methodology to Support a Hybrid Waterfall-Agile in the Banking Domain: A Case Study at Bank XYZ

The results show that the proposed methodology improved work visibility through Kanban-based flow visualization, increased clarity and traceability of workflow and artefacts, and remained fully compatible with the existing stage-gate and regulatory controls.

Muhammad Ali Ihsan Fauzi, Eko K. Budiardjo, Heru Saputra · 0 citations
#software testing Review Open access Sep 2026

Requirements elicitation for AI-Enabled process automation: A comparative review of Agile, Waterfall, and Hybrid implementation approaches

The defensible prescription is neither agility nor hybridity as a blanket label but a gate-differentiated lifecycle: plan-driven discipline where late discovery is irreversible, iterative discipline where early commitment is guesswork.

Joseph Alieme, A. Sule, Valentina Ochuko Obukadata · 1 citation
#explainable ai Review Sep 2026

Problematisation and reconfiguration of knowledge in AI-embedded agile software development

An agility paradox linking reactive, efficiency-oriented AI adoption to potential constraints on proactive agile capabilities is developed, linking reactive, efficiency-oriented AI adoption to potential constraints on proactive agile capabilities.

Fang-Yuan Shen, Ting-Yue Quan · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Stakeholder interaction evaluation model for Agile transformation in the public-sector it environment

A Stakeholder Interaction Evaluation Model (SIEM) is created to evaluate and enhance stakeholder engagement during Agile transformation in a public-sector IT organization in Kazakhstan and enhances project delivery consistency, role clarity, and communication effectiveness.

R. Ismailova, D. Satpayeva, S. Issabayeva et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.