Skip to content

MOPG-7: A Multi-Clinic Dental Panoramic Radiograph Dataset with Expert YOLO Labels

Sep 2026 · Mendeley Data

Abstract

This dataset is a publicly available, multi-clinic dental imaging database that aims at furthering studies on artificial intelligence (AI), computer vision, and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) based on panoramic dental radiographs (orthopantomogram or OPG). This database includes 2,095 completely anonymized panoramic dental radiographs gathered retrospectively from four separate dental centers in Bangladesh, namely Sonia Nursing Home, Tangail (1,433 radiographs); Ibn Sina D. Lab & Consultation Center, Dayaganj (533 radiographs); Niramoy Diagnostic Center, Tangail (114 radiographs); and Health City Diagnostic Center, Gaibandha (15 radiographs). Every image comes with bounding box annotations in both YOLO (.txt) and standard COCO JSON format, validated by experts, making the dataset easy to use with frameworks such as Ultralytics YOLO as well as any COCO-compatible model or data loader. Initial bounding boxes were drawn by a licensed dentist and independently reviewed by a second dental professional. A rigorous quality-control process followed, removing 127 substandard bounding boxes, resulting in 9,834 validated bounding boxes. Dataset Classes The dataset includes annotations for seven clinically relevant dental categories: - Missing Teeth: 2,609 annotations - Dental Crown: 1,984 annotations - Root Canal: 1,956 annotations - Caries: 1,410 annotations - Wisdom Teeth: 869 annotations - Broken Down Teeth: 795 annotations - Healthy OPG: 211 annotations Dataset Contents The released dataset includes: - Panoramic dental radiographs (.jpg) - COCO-format JSON annotation files (instances_train.json, instances_val.json, instances_test.json) - YOLO bounding-box annotation files (.txt) - Metadata files (class_definitions.csv, image_metadata.csv, split_assignments.csv) - Documentation (README.md) describing the dataset structure, annotation format, and usage instructions Potential Research Applications This dataset supports multi-class dental object detection, localization of dental abnormalities, CAD, deep learning for medical imaging, computer vision research, transfer learning and foundation models, explainable AI (XAI), medical image analysis, object detection benchmarking, AI-enabled dental diagnosis, dental AI learning, and reproducibility research. Benchmark Performance Three YOLO variants were evaluated to establish a baseline. YOLOv8m achieved the highest precision (71.9%) and mAP@0.5 (72.9%), with the fastest inference latency (1.9 ms per radiograph). YOLOv10m achieved the highest recall (74.2%) and mAP@0.5:0.95 (34.4%), with a latency of 3.4 ms. YOLOv11m reached a precision of 70.9%, recall of 71.6%, mAP@0.5 of 71.7%, and mAP@0.5:0.95 of 33.5%, with a latency of 4.2 ms. These results show the comparative detection performance and computational efficiency of the evaluated YOLO variants on this dataset.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

Gibson Env: Real-World Perception for Embodied Agents

This paper investigates developing real-world perception for active agents, proposes Gibson Environment for this purpose, and showcases a set of perceptual tasks learned therein.

F. Xia, Amir Zamir, Zhi-Yang He et al. · 1,069 citations · ⚡112
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations...

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

KTO: Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic Optimization

This work proposes a HALO that directly maximizes the utility of generations instead of maximizing the log-likelihood of preferences, and suggests that the best loss depends on the inductive biases most appropriate for a given setting, an oft-overlooked consideration.

Kawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff et al. · 195 citations · ⚡28
#artificial intelligence Open access Jul 2024

Gender, Race, and Intersectional Bias in Resume Screening via Language Model Retrieval

This work investigates the possibilities of using LLMs in a resume screening setting via a document retrieval framework that simulates job candidate selection and finds that the MTEs are biased, significantly favoring White-associated names in 85% of cases and female-associated names in only 11.1% of cases.

Kyra Wilson, Aylin Caliskan · 131 citations · ⚡8
#artificial intelligence Review Nov 2024

How to Build a Quantum Supercomputer: Scaling from Hundreds to Millions of Qubits

This work shows that orders of magnitude enhancement in performance could be obtained by a combination of hardware improvements and tight quantum-HPC integration and introduces high-performance architectures for quantum-probabilistic computing with custom-designed accelerators to tackle today's industry-scale classical...

Masoud Mohseni, Artur Scherer, K. Johnson et al. · 121 citations · ⚡9

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.