Skip to content

WRRA Core 1.0: A Domain-Agnostic Execution Architecture

Sep 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

WRRA Core 1.0 defines a frozen, domain-agnostic execution architecture derived from Minimal Computing Cosmology but independent of any specific physical theory or application. Its three constitutional invariants are Minimum Viable Computation, Common Carrier, and Phenotype. These are combined with the Fixed-Present, Ownership, Boundary, Renderer, Record/Ledger, and Fail-Closed principles to describe how a system receives a SOURCE, organizes RELATIONS and STATE, preserves past effects as present RESIDUE or RECORD, updates the next present through reusable carriers, and renders observable PHENOTYPES.The document separates the invariant WRRA Core from changeable Domain Profiles, so revisions in cosmology, physics, biology, artificial intelligence, economics, meteorology, mathematics, or methodology do not automatically require a revision of the Core. It also records the complete WRRA application lineage through 7 September 2026, including WRRA-Physics and Minimal Computing Cosmology, WRRA-Bio, WRRA-Cell, WRRA-AI, WRRA-Worm, WRRA-Econ, WRRA-Met, WRRA-Math/WJNS, and the Interpretation–Prediction Boundary framework.The specification provides formal execution equations, ownership rules, validation contracts, domain mappings, minimum conformance conditions, a Core checklist, version-control rules, and a standard template for constructing future WRRA Domain Profiles. Claims are explicitly separated into interpretation, computation, prediction, control, and OPEN states to prevent structural models from being misrepresented as empirical validation. WRRA Core 1.0 is therefore presented as a reusable audit grammar for complex systems: how they execute the present, transport information and resources, generate observable expressions, preserve records, and distinguish minimally sufficient structure from both deficiency and excess.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access May 2023

Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark

GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.

Xiaotian Zhang, Chun-yan Li, Yi Zong et al. · 216 citations · ⚡17

PRISM: Self-Pruning Intrinsic Selection Method for Training-Free Multimodal Data Selection

Empirically, PRISM reduces the end-to-end time for data selection and model tuning to just 30% of conventional pipelines, and achieves this efficiency while simultaneously enhancing performance, surpassing models fine-tuned on the full dataset across eight multimodal and three language understanding benchmarks.

Jinhe Bi, Yifan Wang, Danqi Yan et al. · 73 citations · ⚡4
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Apr 2020

ECCOLA - a Method for Implementing Ethically Aligned AI Systems

The method, ECCOLA, is presented, which aims at making the high-level AI ethics principles more practical, making it possible for developers to more easily implement them in practice.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, P. Abrahamsson · 64 citations · ⚡6

Let the Flows Tell: Solving Graph Combinatorial Optimization Problems with GFlowNets

This paper designs Markov decision processes (MDPs) for different combinatorial problems and proposes to train conditional GFlowNets to sample from the solution space and demonstrates that GFlowNet policies can efficiently find high-quality solutions.

Dinghuai Zhang, H. Dai, Esmeralda S. Whitammer et al. · 59 citations · ⚡8

Ethically Aligned Design of Autonomous Systems: Industry viewpoint and an empirical study

An empirical study on the current state of practice in artificial intelligence ethics is conducted by means of a multiple case study of five case companies, which indicates a gap between research and practice in the area.

Ville Vakkuri, Kai-Kristian Kemell, Joni Kultanen et al. · 56 citations · ⚡6
#artificial intelligence Conference Open access Jun 2018

The Key Concepts of Ethics of Artificial Intelligence

It is suggested that the focus on finding keywords is the first step in guiding and providing direction for future research in the AI ethics field.

Ville Vakkuri, P. Abrahamsson · 39 citations · ⚡2

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.