Aug 2026· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2· 1 citation· 30 references
TL;DR
This work introduces the Text-to-Flux task and proposes FluxEngine, a novel automated pipeline for dataset construction, and provides the essential infrastructure to foster future research in NLI for TSDBs.
Abstract
The proliferation of IoT and real-time monitoring has established Time-Series Databases (TSDBs) like InfluxDB as critical infrastructure. However, their functional query languages (e.g., Flux) present a steep learning curve, hindering data accessibility for non-experts. While Natural Language Interfaces (NLIs) offer a potential solution, the domain of Text-to-Flux is stalled by a critical bottleneck: the complete absence of diverse, high-quality paired benchmarks. To address this, we introduce the Text-to-Flux task and propose FluxEngine, a novel automated pipeline for dataset construction. Unlike static generation methods used in Text-to-SQL, our framework features a Self-Sustaining Live Data Context that utilizes background tasks to perpetually generate fresh data, ensuring that queries involving relative time windows (e.g., ''past hour'') remain executable and valid indefinitely. Using this framework, we construct and release TEFD (Text-to-Flux Dataset), the first large-scale benchmark for this task. We further define execution-based evaluation metrics tailored for time-series validity. This work provides the essential infrastructure to foster future research in NLI for TSDBs. To facilitate reproducibility and future research, our dataset and benchmark code are publicly available at https://github.com/gta886/TEFD-Benchmark.
A large-scale benchmark with 60\sim 90× more queries than prior work, built on 3× more databases, an automated pipeline that can execute existing methods without manual intervention, and multi-dimensional, fine-grained evaluation metrics for comprehensive assessment.
Bo Li, Chenzhan Wang, Long-Kang Lin et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced natural-language-to-query (Text-to-Query) capabilities, yet existing public benchmarks remain confined to single database paradigms such as Text-to-SQL or Text-to-KG. They do not capture real-world settings where relational databases, graph databases, document database...
Guo-Shen Li, Hang Zhang, Ying-Jun Liu et al.· 2026 12th International Conf...· 0 citations
To bridge the semantic gap in NL2SQL (Natural Language to SQL) tasks, this study proposes a "Question→SQL→Wiki" framework that leverages a dynamic Wiki Graph as an intermediate reasoning layer. Departing from conventional NL2SQL approaches that rely solely on end-to-end mapping, our method utilizes Large Language Model...
Jia-Xuan Liu, Shi-Yu Fang, Ji-Bing Wu et al.· 2026 12th International Conf...· 0 citations
TQTS-BENCH is introduced, a multi-syntax benchmark for evaluating text-to-query capabilities over TSDBs, and error analysis reveals that this performance gap mainly stems from the heterogeneous query syntaxes across different TSDBs, misinterpretation of time-specific intents, and incorrect schema linking.
Fei Lyu, Zhi-Yi Peng, Jia-Ming Liu et al.· 0 citations
DBLifeBench is introduced, the first benchmark to evaluate LLMs across five critical lifecycle phases: Design, Implementation, Operation, Debugging, and Maintenance, and a novel task utilizing structured reasoning graphs to mimic human iterative problem-solving is proposed.
Shunfan Zheng, Dong-Sheng Shi, Yue Li et al.· 0 citations
A comprehensive evaluation of 17 state-of-the-art methods across Temporal Graph Neural Networks (TGNNs) and Large Language Model (LLM)-based paradigms reveals a clear capability divide between the two paradigms: TGNN-based methods excel at structural prediction but fail at semantic tracking, whereas LLM-based predictor...
Longfei Ma, Ze-Min Liu, Fei Wu· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.