Skip to content
Open access

Accuracy of a Novel Designed Standard Operating Procedure for Orthodontic Diagnosis (SOPOD) Compared with Routine Methods Among Dental Interns: A Comparative Cross Sectional Study

Aug 2026 · Journal of Dental Health and Oral Research · Vol 7, pp. 1-7 · 0 citations · 10 references

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy and time efficiency of a Standard Operating Protocol for Orthodontic Diagnosis (SOPOD) with routine diagnostic methods among dental interns. Materials and Methods: Twenty seven dental interns with ≥2 weeks of orthodontic clinical posting participated. Baseline diagnoses were established by an experienced orthodontist. Each intern first diagnosed selected malocclusion cases using routine procedures based on Proffit’s approach, followed by re diagnosis of the same cases using SOPOD. Diagnostic accuracy scores and time taken were recorded. Comparisons between methods were analyzed using paired t tests. Results: SOPOD yielded significantly higher diagnostic accuracy and improved consistency compared with routine methods. Variability among interns was reduced and diagnostic time was shorter. Differences between the two approaches were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: SOPOD enhanced diagnostic accuracy and efficiency among dental interns. Incorporating SOPOD training into undergraduate orthodontic curricula may strengthen diagnostic competence and clinical decision making.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Different tools, same diagnosis? A comparison of digital orthodontic model analysis methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

The free orthodontic software produced tooth-width and arch space deficiency measurements clinically comparable to those of the commercial platform and within clinically acceptable agreement limits of plaster-cast calliper measurements.

Dicle Ceylan, Celal Genç, Gökhan Serhat Duran · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Validation of a digital tool for Moyers mixed dentition analysis: agreement and efficiency compared with the manual method

ABSTRACT Introduction: Mixed dentition analysis is essential for predicting space requirements and guiding early orthodontic decision-making. Moyers analysis is widely used due to its simplicity and clinical applicability, however, manual execution may increase execution time and introduce operator-dependent errors. Ob...

Mariana Vasconcellos Bazoli Rodrigues, Luciana Rougemont Squeff, Amanda Cunha Regal de Castro et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparison of diagnosis and treatment planning based on clinical and radiographic findings in traumatized teeth between pedodontists and GPT-4.1 mini: An evaluation in light of AAPD Guidelines

AIM. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical performance of pedodontists with that of the GPT-4.1 mini model, operating on the ChatGPT platform developed by OpenAI, in the diagnosis and treatment planning of traumatic dental injuries in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This study was conducted us...

İ. Aydoğan, B. Sülü, H. Z. Türk et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Accuracy and Clinical Applicability of Automated 3D CBCT-based Cephalometric Analysis in Children and Adolescents

This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and clinical applicability of an automated landmark identification (ALI) system for three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based cephalometric analysis in pediatric and adolescent patients. The influence of dentition stage on system performance was also investig...

Hyejin Jung, Seoyeon Wi, B. Park et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Evaluation of the prevalence of malocclusion in individuals applying for orthodontic treatment in the Turkish community: A cross-sectional study

The relatively similar rates of Class I and Class III in dental classification highlight the need for careful diagnostic assessment and the importance of combining occlusal and cephalometric evaluations to inform individualized treatment planning.

H. G. Oğuz, Fırat Oğuz, Onur Kaya · 0 citations
Sep 2026

A novel four-teeth model for dental age estimation: Reliability, validity, and comparative accuracy with a seven-teeth approach.

Dental age estimation plays a critical role in forensic identification and legal age determination, particularly in children and adolescents. Although multi-tooth regression models demonstrate high predictive accuracy, their application may be restricted in situations involving incomplete dentition or suboptimal radiog...

R. Prabhu, K. Yashaswini, Prashanth Shenoy et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.