2026· SHS Web of Conferences· 0 citations· 13 references
TL;DR
A conceptual framework that connects traditional project governance, agile execution and artificial intelligence (AI)-supported decision-making within one operating model is developed and argues that AI creates value only when its outputs are connected to an existing decision process at the point where action is still possible.
Abstract
Software delivery in large organisations is shaped by two different needs. Management must maintain control over scope, cost, commitments, risk and compliance, while delivery teams must respond when technical findings, user feedback or external dependencies change the working assumptions. This paper develops a conceptual framework that connects traditional project governance, agile execution and artificial intelligence (AI)-supported decision-making within one operating model. Five applications are considered: effort and capacity estimation, backlog prioritisation, delivery-risk sensing, project knowledge capture and software quality analytics. The framework also treats bias in historical records, data quality, explainability and accountability as project-management concerns. Four propositions link the framework with schedule adherence, scope control, rework, throughput, release quality and stakeholder satisfaction. A staged route for empirical validation and a practical readiness assessment are proposed. The study is conceptual and draws on practitioner-informed observations. It argues that AI creates value only when its outputs are connected to an existing decision process at the point where action is still possible; responsibility for interpreting, accepting or rejecting the recommendation remains with the accountable project participants.
Resource allocation in Agile software development is often performed reactively, limiting the ability of project managers to evaluate the impact of changing requirements, workload fluctuations, resource availability, and task dependencies before decisions are implemented. Existing project management tools provide visib...
Syfa Nur Lathifah, Elvira Lailatuth Thohiroh· International Conferences on...· 0 citations
An agility paradox linking reactive, efficiency-oriented AI adoption to potential constraints on proactive agile capabilities is developed, linking reactive, efficiency-oriented AI adoption to potential constraints on proactive agile capabilities.
Fang-Yuan Shen, Ting-Yue Quan· Journal of Enterprise Inform...· 0 citations
The Socio-Technical AI Governance in Project Management (STAG-PM) framework is proposed to explain how AI capabilities interact with managerial judgment, organizational processes, and institutional governance in project environments and provides a conceptual basis for future empirical research and context-sensitive AI...
Afsana Munni, Mustafa Alokoud· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
As software engineering has evolved, development environments have increasingly integrated automated support for tasks such as testing, analysis, and code generation, requiring project management to coordinate both human work and automated workflows. In this paper, we investigate how software project managers perceive...
R. E. de Souza Santos, Ítalo Santos, Cleyton Magalhães· Proceedings of the 1st Inter...· 0 citations
As organisations race to deploy GenAI for a range of customer and internally facing applications, a critical gap has emerged: the assumption that enterprise knowledge is ready for AI consumption. Research indicates that more than 80 per cent of AI projects fail to deliver measurable business value,1 while Gartner found...