ChatGPT has the potential to provide accurate information to families of children with CP; however, improvements in understandability, actionability, and readability are needed to better support families.
While ChatGPT provided generally acceptable clinical information, variability in readability and expert ratings raises patient safety concerns and AI-generated health content should be reviewed and tailored to older adults' health literacy needs before clinical use.
Merve Arı, N. Ilçin, Hatice Yağcıoğlu et al.· Revista da Associação Médica...· 0 citations
ChatGPT-generated responses demonstrated higher quality, accuracy, and reliability than those generated by Gemini, Nonetheless, patient accessibility could be limited by the poor readability metrics observed in both tools.
A. A. Delibay, Cimen Olçay Demir, Nisa Turutgen et al.· Multiple Sclerosis and Relat...· 0 citations
ChatGPT-4o and ChatGPT-5 provide generally satisfactory yet non-comprehensive, limited-quality information at a level above tenth-grade regarding hallux rigidus fusion surgery.
Kamil Balaban, Mehmet Batu Ertan, Mahmut Kalem· Digital Health· 0 citations
LLMs can provide generally accurate and consistent responses to patient-centered questions about lipedema, particularly in areas related to general information and diagnosis, however, reduced accuracy and reproducibility in complex clinical domains suggest that expert oversight is essential when using these tools for p...
Rabia Sanır, E. Türkmen, E. Giray et al.· Phlebology· 0 citations
IntroductionXerostomia is a common condition that can impair quality of life. Google and ChatGPT are increasingly used for patient education, though the readability and understandability of this information remain unclear. This study evaluated commonly asked questions about xerostomia and assessed the quality of online...
S. Razmi, Lexi Goehring, Hassan Z. Baig et al.· Ear, nose, & throat journal· 0 citations
ChatGPT 5.2 is a valuable AI–assisted chatbot that facilitates patient education by providing responses regarding sleeve gastrectomy that are generally accurate and acceptable, but the categorization of 4–16% of the responses as "Incorrect," the overall difficult readability levels, and the significant variability obse...
Furkan Türkoğlu, Elif Nur Gencer, Emre Erdoğan· Archives of Current Medical...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.