Jan 2026· Trends in Hearing· Vol 30· 0 citations· 48 references
Medicine
TL;DR
It is suggested that cochlear-status measures, conventional ARTs, and functional SiN performance provide complementary information beyond the conventional audiogram in occupational hearing surveillance.
Abstract
Young adults with normal conventional audiograms may nonetheless show early noise-related auditory differences that routine surveillance misses. We evaluated a clinically feasible test battery using 280 occupationally noise-exposed workers and 100 age-matched low-noise controls (20-40 years; ≤20 dB HL at 0.5-8 kHz). Measures included conventional and extended high-frequency (EHF; 9-16 kHz) audiometry, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs; 0.5-10 kHz), ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds (ARTs; 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz; 226-Hz probe tone), click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR; wave I, wave V, and V/I ratio at 50 and 90 dBnHL), and Mandarin Bamford-Kowal-Bench speech-in-noise testing (SiN). Noise-exposed participants showed elevated ARTs at all elicitor frequencies, with the largest elevation at 2 kHz, as well as poorer EHF thresholds and lower DPOAE levels. In contrast, click-evoked ABR metrics did not differ between groups. After controlling for conventional-frequency pure-tone average (PTA4; 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) and extended high-frequency pure-tone average (PTAEHF; 9–16 kHz), lower DPOAE amplitudes were associated with higher ARTs. ARTs were not significantly associated with SiN performance, quantified as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) required for 50% correct recognition (SNR-50), cumulative noise exposure, or ABR measures. The noise-exposed group showed higher SNR-50 values, indicating poorer speech-in-noise performance. Within the noise-exposed group, SNR-50 was associated with PTA4 and cumulative noise exposure, whereas its association with PTAEHF was weaker and did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Together, these findings suggest that cochlear-status measures, conventional ARTs, and functional SiN performance provide complementary information beyond the conventional audiogram in occupational hearing surveillance.
Abstract This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the effects of occupational noise exposure on objective auditory function and self-reported hearing difficulties in young adult dental professionals. It included 56 young adults (aged 18–40), divided into the noise-exposed (n=31) and unexposed control group (n=25)....
Büşra Terzioğlu, B. Türkoğlu, Ömer Faruk Demir et al.· Arhiv za Higijenu Rada i Tok...· 0 citations
Occupational noise exposure was associated with a poorer hearing and a steeper age-related widening of the threshold gap versus unexposed individuals, most prominently at 2 and 4 kHz.
Dongha Kim, Sungwon Park, Jingyeong Jeong et al.· European archives of oto-rhi...· 0 citations
Evidence is found that utilizing passive flat-attenuating ER-20 earplugs, and active flat-attenuating MP9-15 earplugs provide better speech understanding in noise for normal hearing listeners.
Trevor A. Simones, Darryl M. Horn, M. Pienkowski· 0 citations
Background: Occupational noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is documented in mining and manufacturing but remains understudied in hospital settings. Support workers in laundry units, oxygen plants, and Central Sterile Supply Departments (CSSDs) face hazardous noise exposure but remain underrepresented in hearing conserv...
Tshering Yangdon, K. Yangden, P. Wangchuk et al.· Bhutan health journal· 0 citations
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether hearing aids improve speech recognition in noise and self-reported listening outcomes in clinically heterogeneous adults with subjective listening difficulties in noise.
DESIGN
Prospective, uncontrolled, within-subject intervention study. Participants completed multidimensional baseline...
Joon Shin, Harvey Dillon· International Journal of Aud...· 0 citations
The use of personal listening devices (PLDs) has increased markedly among youth, particularly for leisure activities and during the pandemic. Nearly one in four college students listens to PLDs at free-field equivalent levels exceeding 80 dBA, with a majority being unaware of the associated risks. Exposure to loud soun...
Teja Deepak Dessai, Vivek Singh Bhadauria, Rashmi J. Bhat et al.· The Egyptian Journal of Otol...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.