Skip to content
#generative ai Review Open access

Profiles of Primary School Teachers’ Engagement with Generative AI: The Role of Risk, Trust, and Professional Development Needs

Sep 2026 · Education sciences · 2 citations · 45 references

TL;DR

The findings highlight the heterogeneity of primary school teachers’ engagement with GenAI and suggest that professional development should support both AI-related competencies and informed professional judgment when integrating AI into educational practice.

Abstract

The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping educational practice, yet little is known about how primary school teachers perceive and engage with these technologies. This study examined primary school teachers’ perceived risks, trust in AI, professional development (PD) needs, and patterns of AI use. Data were collected through a survey of 295 primary school teachers. Hierarchical and k-means cluster analyses were conducted to identify distinct profiles of AI engagement. The results indicate a state of cautious openness characterized by moderate to high perceived risks, relatively low trust, and substantial PD needs. Three profiles emerged: Skeptical Rejecters, Interested but Uncertain, and Trusting Learners. The profiles differed significantly in their current and intended use of AI. Across all profiles, intended use exceeded actual implementation, indicating an intention-usage gap. Notably, the highest PD needs were reported by the Interested but Uncertain profile rather than by the most skeptical teachers. The findings highlight the heterogeneity of primary school teachers’ engagement with GenAI and suggest that professional development should support both AI-related competencies and informed professional judgment when integrating AI into educational practice.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Open access Sep 2026

Exploring Teachers’ Latent Resistance to AI-Supported Teaching: A Qualitative Study

Teachers’ latent resistance to AI-supported teaching is explored by examining how teachers described AI use, set professional boundaries, justified cautious or selective engagement, and identified conditions that might reduce such resistance.

Meriç Boynukara, Talha Çiçek, Rabia Durhan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Teachers’ self-regulated learning profiles in artificial intelligence contexts: implications for differentiated professional development

The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education requires teachers to develop new competencies and manage their own learning. While research has examined teachers’ AI attitudes, acceptance, and literacy, less is known about how they regulate their learning in AI contexts. This study examined tea...

Yu-Hao Su, Mustafa Alpsülün, Müge Vuran et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Institutional and Demographic Predictors of Teachers’ Positive Perceptions of 4IR Technologies for Professional Development

Although Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies are increasingly promoted in education, their adoption for teacher professional development (PD) remains uneven. One key challenge is the limited understanding of what makes teachers receptive to these technologies. This quantitative study investigates how instit...

Chidubem Deborah Adamu, O. Awodiji · 0 citations
#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Guarded adoption of generative AI in higher education: high-achieving students, successful-student identity, and epistemic agency in a single-university mixed-methods survey

This mixed-methods survey of students at one Australian university examined whether successful-student identity and student-reported academic achievement were associated with different patterns of generative AI engagement, interpreting this pattern as guarded adoption.

Jason Zagami · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Bridging the Attitude-Engagement Gap: Instructor Perceptions, Predictors, and Institutional Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education

Student Experience Impact and General Perceptions were the primary psychological predictors of institutional AI engagement, while gender and School of Education affiliation were the significant demographic predictors.

Fatima Khalifeh, Raúl Santiago, Ramon Palau · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Teachers and Generative AI: A Systematic Review of Adoption, Competence, Professional Development, and Socio-Technical Experiences

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly become integrated into teaching, yet evidence on how teachers actually adopt, experience, and implement it remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesizes 105 peer-reviewed empirical studies published since 2023, identified through a PRISMA-guided search of thr...

Sara Ayubian, Génesis Aguilar Chávez, Ernestina Wiafe et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 22, 2026

Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations

Flint-interactive gives AI agents a language for creating interactive visualizations. Click a chart, filter data, highlight related content, and explore beyond the view the author originally chose. The post Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.