The findings highlight the heterogeneity of primary school teachers’ engagement with GenAI and suggest that professional development should support both AI-related competencies and informed professional judgment when integrating AI into educational practice.
Abstract
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping educational practice, yet little is known about how primary school teachers perceive and engage with these technologies. This study examined primary school teachers’ perceived risks, trust in AI, professional development (PD) needs, and patterns of AI use. Data were collected through a survey of 295 primary school teachers. Hierarchical and k-means cluster analyses were conducted to identify distinct profiles of AI engagement. The results indicate a state of cautious openness characterized by moderate to high perceived risks, relatively low trust, and substantial PD needs. Three profiles emerged: Skeptical Rejecters, Interested but Uncertain, and Trusting Learners. The profiles differed significantly in their current and intended use of AI. Across all profiles, intended use exceeded actual implementation, indicating an intention-usage gap. Notably, the highest PD needs were reported by the Interested but Uncertain profile rather than by the most skeptical teachers. The findings highlight the heterogeneity of primary school teachers’ engagement with GenAI and suggest that professional development should support both AI-related competencies and informed professional judgment when integrating AI into educational practice.
Teachers’ latent resistance to AI-supported teaching is explored by examining how teachers described AI use, set professional boundaries, justified cautious or selective engagement, and identified conditions that might reduce such resistance.
Meriç Boynukara, Talha Çiçek, Rabia Durhan et al.· International Journal of Cur...· 0 citations
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into education requires teachers to develop new competencies and manage their own learning. While research has examined teachers’ AI attitudes, acceptance, and literacy, less is known about how they regulate their learning in AI contexts. This study examined tea...
Yu-Hao Su, Mustafa Alpsülün, Müge Vuran et al.· Frontiers in Psychology· 0 citations
Although Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) technologies are increasingly promoted in education, their adoption for teacher professional development (PD) remains uneven. One key challenge is the limited understanding of what makes teachers receptive to these technologies. This quantitative study investigates how instit...
Chidubem Deborah Adamu, O. Awodiji· The International Journal of...· 0 citations
This mixed-methods survey of students at one Australian university examined whether successful-student identity and student-reported academic achievement were associated with different patterns of generative AI engagement, interpreting this pattern as guarded adoption.
Jason Zagami· International Journal of Edu...· 0 citations
Student Experience Impact and General Perceptions were the primary psychological predictors of institutional AI engagement, while gender and School of Education affiliation were the significant demographic predictors.
Fatima Khalifeh, Raúl Santiago, Ramon Palau· International journal of res...· 0 citations
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly become integrated into teaching, yet evidence on how teachers actually adopt, experience, and implement it remains fragmented. This systematic review synthesizes 105 peer-reviewed empirical studies published since 2023, identified through a PRISMA-guided search of thr...
Sara Ayubian, Génesis Aguilar Chávez, Ernestina Wiafe et al.· Education sciences· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 23, 2026
In Compton Lecture, the distinguished legal scholar warns of potential “loss of the Enlightenment” while suggesting ways innovations can meet our civic and cultural needs.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
Microsoft Research Blog· microsoft.comOct 22, 2026
Flint-interactive gives AI agents a language for creating interactive visualizations. Click a chart, filter data, highlight related content, and explore beyond the view the author originally chose. The post Flint-interactive: A language for creating interactive data visualizations appeared first on Microsoft Research.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.