Skip to content
Review Open access

Nanomaterial Strategies for Pulmonary Delivery of Immunotherapeutics in Lung Cancer Treatment

Aug 2026 · Advanced Healthcare Materials · Vol 15 · 0 citations · 196 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Advances in inhalable immunotherapeutic nanomedicines support inhalable immunotherapeutic nanomedicines as a complementary approach to current lung cancer treatment and a broader framework for pulmonary immune modulation.

Abstract

Organ‐selective immunomodulation is increasingly viewed as a route to improve the therapeutic index of cancer immunotherapy, yet most agents are still delivered systemically, where limited tumor exposure and immune‐related toxicities remain common. The lung is an attractive site for local intervention because it is directly accessible and immunologically specialized. However, effective pulmonary delivery is constrained by mucociliary clearance, airway mucus, alveolar macrophage uptake, and epithelial barriers. Nanomaterials can be rationally engineered to address these constraints, increasing pulmonary retention and concentrating immunotherapeutics within the lung tumor microenvironment while reducing systemic burden. This Review summarized the key physiological barriers for pulmonary immunotherapeutic delivery and discusses how nanomaterial properties shape deposition, retention, cellular partitioning, and downstream immune activation. We critically evaluate representative inhalable platforms across major immunotherapeutic modalities, including vaccines, immune checkpoint blockade, innate immune agonists (e.g., STING agonists), cytokine regulation, and emerging in situ immune‐cell engineering strategies. We also highlight translational considerations. Together, these advances support inhalable immunotherapeutic nanomedicines as a complementary approach to current lung cancer treatment and a broader framework for pulmonary immune modulation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Precision nanomedicine for pulmonary diseases: from molecular targeting to clinical translation

This work provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of respiratory nanomedicine, bridging fundamental nanoparticle bioengineering with a wide range of pulmonary pathologies and the obstacles to clinical translation.

Zicheng Deng, Wen Gao, Jonathan Do et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Lipid Nanoparticles Based Multi-Scale Systemic Immune Programming for Cancer Therapy.

The clinical reach of cancer immunotherapy is currently limited by off-target toxicity, physical barriers in solid tumors, and the complex manufacturing of personalized cell therapies. This review presents multi-scale systemic immune programming as a transformative approach, in which lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) function...

Xinwen Lin, Yong Li, Xi-Ling Shen et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Crossing lung barriers: inhalable biomaterials for lung cancer from design to application.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Systemic drug delivery often results in low lung accumulation and high toxicity. Inhalable biomaterials offer a promising alternative by delivering therapeutics directly to lung lesions, enabling high local concentrations and minimal systemic exposure. Th...

Wei Zhang, Rui Feng, Cheng Cao · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Immunological Interactions of Carbon Nanomaterials: Translational Perspectives in Oncology Drug Development

: Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by enabling the immune system to target malignant cells. However, many patients show limited responses due to tumour heterogeneity, immune evasion, and the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. To address these challenges, nanotechnology has emerged as a promisin...

Davide Frumento, Ș. Țălu · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Stealth Strategies for Cancer Nanomedicine: A Review of Immune Evasion and Tumor Targeting

Nanocarrier platforms can improve cancer therapy through enhanced selectivity and reduced systemic toxicity. Yet mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) clearance sharply limits delivery; in preclinical models, often less than 1% of the injected dose reaches tumors. Surface-engineering strategies that let nanocarriers evade...

Anish Chitra, S. Chetty · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.