Skip to content

An Auditable Symbolic-RAG-Generative AI Architecture for Goal-Oriented Conversation Orchestration

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 36 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A Symbolic-RAG-Generative architecture centered on the Goal-oriented Retrieval-Augmented Conversation Engine (GRACE) is proposed, which establishes compelling symbolic-state performance across standard, multi-goal, RAG-detour, validation, refusal, and robustness scenarios.

Abstract

Goal-oriented conversational systems must answer factual questions, understand visitor-provided information, and advance business objectives without becoming rigid questionnaires. This paper proposes a Symbolic-RAG-Generative architecture centered on the Goal-oriented Retrieval-Augmented Conversation Engine (GRACE). An instruction-constrained Business Goal Compiler transforms business intent into an immutable objective set, normalized priority vector, canonical questions, and initial state vector. At runtime, GRACE receives the complete conversation history, latest visitor message, current state, and grounded answer generated by a separate RAG component. It updates completion only from visitor-authored evidence and selects one contextually modulated follow-up. The core policy maximizes expected business progress subject to a minimum visitor-utility constraint. We formalize the state, monotonic transitions, source separation, question modulation, and constrained policy; present the reference architecture; and define an evaluation comprising 24 English real-estate and 10 Spanish professional-cleaning conversations, totaling 119 protocol-defined visitor turns. Across both domains, GRACE achieves 84.9% exact state-transition accuracy, 91.6% evidence precision, 89.6% evidence recall, 100% monotonicity, and 94.1% terminal-state accuracy. The evaluation establishes compelling symbolic-state performance across standard, multi-goal, RAG-detour, validation, refusal, and robustness scenarios.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Graph-Driven Intent Modeling in Conversational AI: Architectural Patterns for Enterprise Financial Platforms

Conversational AI deployments within enterprise financial institutions contend with a particularly demanding intersection of technical and regulatory requirements. Managing layered customer intent hierarchies while simultaneously satisfying compliance mandates, security protocols, and scalability thresholds demands arc...

Dinesh Reddy Kasu · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Persistent Goal-Tracking and Instruction-Driven Reasoning in Sequential Conversation QA

GSC-QA (Goal-based Sequential Conversation QA), a framework that integrates three complementary components into a unified enterprise dialogue architecture that combines retrieval, instruction enforcement, and goal persistence in a single coordinated loop built on LangGraph, is introduced.

Quoc-Dung Ngo, Quang-Dung Dang, Ly-Huynh Phan · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

SAGE: State-Grounded, Abstention-Aware Evaluation of Task-Oriented Dialogue Agents

SAGE (State-Grounded Abstention-Aware Evaluation), which compiles a workflow specification and per-turn state diff into atomic, schema-grounded criteria and routes each through a cascade of symbolic and encoder/NLI verifiers that abstain rather than guess, aggregating criterion verdicts into a turn-level decision with...

Rayan Khoury, Shih-Yao Lin, P. Mishra · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Bridging the Trust Gap: A Hybrid Intuitive-Rational Architecture for Certified University Assistants

A proof-of-concept neuro-symbolic architecture for “certified” academic advising that shows how an LLM-based university assistant can be connected to an auditable and reproducible symbolic layer, while preserving a clear separation between linguistic interaction and formal regulatory reasoning.

Giovanni Pilato, Mustafa Sert · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

STAIR: Semantic-Temporal Automaton for Interpretable Reasoning in Temporal Question Answering

STAIR separates semantic interpretation from precise temporal inference: an answer-free LLM adapter maps complex question formulations to normalized temporal intents, while a deterministic temporal automaton with finite control and guarded transitions executes the corresponding policies over canonicalized evidence.

Xin-Long Dai, Jin-Chuan Zhang, Lei Gao et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.