Skip to content

Sharp Minimax Regret for Infinite-Memory Logistic Prediction

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 39 references
Computer Science Mathematics

TL;DR

This work determines the minimax cumulative log-loss regret of a finite-alphabet, exogenously driven source with genuinely infinite input memory, and shows memory decay cannot determine regret, and that a profile-scaled online Newton predictor attains $O_B(\Gamma_T(r)$ in polynomial time per round.

Abstract

We determine the minimax cumulative log-loss regret of a finite-alphabet, exogenously driven source with genuinely infinite input memory: independent Rademacher inputs $(U_t)$ are observed sequentially and the next binary mark has logit $\sum_{j\ge1}\theta_jU_{t+1-j}$, the unknown coefficients obeying a summable envelope $|\theta_j|\le r_j$, $\sum_jr_j\le B$. At horizon $T$, lag $j$ can move the logit by at most $r_j$ and is exercised in only $n_{T,j}=(T-j+1)_+$ rounds, and the two limitations combine into the sum $\Gamma_T(r)=\sum_{j\le T}\log(1+n_{T,j}r_j^{2})$. One coordinate-localised Bayesian mixture achieves $R_T(r)\le C\Gamma_T(r)$ for \emph{every} summable envelope with $C$ universal. Our main result is a matching nonasymptotic converse for the canonical exponential and polynomial envelopes; its new ingredients are a modular finite-sample information bound for logistic experiments with an exogenous random design, and a conditioning estimate for the overlapping Toeplitz lag matrix obtained by exhibiting each off-diagonal Gram sum as a sum of independent Rademacher variables indexed by the edges of a forest, needing neither local asymptotic normality nor any spectral theorem for random Toeplitz matrices. So $\Gamma_T(r)$ is the minimax regret scale here, giving $\Theta(\alpha^{-1}\log^{2}T)$ for $r_j=Ae^{-\alpha j}$ and $\Theta(T^{1/(2s)})$ for $r_j=Aj^{-s}$, $s>1$ --- the latter without the extra $(\log T)^{1-1/(2s)}$ factor any window-truncation analysis pays. We also show memory decay cannot determine regret, and that a profile-scaled online Newton predictor attains $O_B(\Gamma_T(r))$ in polynomial time per round.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Parameter-Free Interval-Dynamic Regret under Heavy-Tailed Noise

We study online convex optimization with one unbiased stochastic subgradient per round and an unknown finite conditional $p$th noise moment, $1<p\le2$. For every fixed interval $I$ of length $n$ and comparator path with $\Lambda_I=1+P_I/D$, one learner achieves \[ E[Regret_I(u)]\le\min(GDn, C[GD\sqrt{n(\Lambda_I+\log^2...

Vaneet Aggarwal · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

One Spectrum, Two Resources: Data-Memory Scaling in Autoregressive Prediction

The minimax law is proved, showing that the two resources are governed by one predictive-energy spectrum in a positive-entropy autoregressive retrieval source and giving exponent-adaptive allocation, finite-precision realization, and compute-precision laws under two-sided arithmetic assumptions.

Chi-Wun Yang, Xiao-Yu Li · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

A positive resolution of the gap-entropy conjecture

We prove the gap-entropy conjecture for fixed-confidence best-arm identification with independent unit-variance Gaussian arms, means in $[0,1]$, and a unique optimal arm. For each suboptimal arm $i$, let $\Delta_i=\mu_*-\mu_i$ be its gap from the optimal mean, and write $H=\sum_{i\ne *}\Delta_i^{-2}$. Let $p_r$ be the...

P. M. Aronow, Nathan Kallus, Patrick Lopatto · 1 citation
Preprint Aug 2026

Sequential Euclidean connections with exponential memory: distributional performance and adversarial robustness

Comparison with the running mean highlights the stationary insertion-length distribution, its time-homogeneous update, stationary coefficient profile, and fixed effective memory, and its time-homogeneous update, stationary coefficient profile, and fixed effective memory.

P. D. de Castro · 1 citation · ⚡1
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Bandits with Probing: Optimal Regret and the Limits of Winner Feedback

A learner probes at most $k$ of $n$ arms each round, receives the maximum of their rewards in $[0,1]$, and competes with the best fixed arm. When does the probing advantage pay for learning? We determine two minimax laws. Under independent stochastic rewards with winner feedback (the maximum and a winning label), or on...

Yong-Jie Guan · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Generalized Linear Bandits with Memory

This analysis provides a unified treatment of memory-induced non-stationarity and nonlinear link functions, while ensuring that the leading regret term is independent of the curvature of the link function.

Heesang Ann, Hyunjun Choi, Taehyun Hwang et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.