DeBERTa-Sentinel is introduced, a responsible AI-generated text detection framework leveraging DeBERTa-v3's disentangled attention to capture subtle structural irregularities in synthetic content and promotes trustworthy, ethical, and human-centric AI systems.
Abstract
The rapid spread of large language models (LLMs) across the web raises concerns about misinformation, academic integrity, automated content manipulation, and risks to vulnerable online communities. Existing transformer-based detectors, such as GPT-Sentinel, show promise but struggle to generalize to diverse model outputs and paraphrasing attacks, limiting their role in building trustworthy web ecosystems. This work introduces DeBERTa-Sentinel, a responsible AI-generated text detection framework leveraging DeBERTa-v3's disentangled attention to capture subtle structural irregularities in synthetic content. A central design principle is transparency: unlike black-box commercial detectors, DeBERTa-Sentinel exposes token-level explanations of its decisions, enabling affected stakeholders journalists, educators, and platform trust and safety teams to audit, challenge, and contextualize detection outcomes. Using the GLC-AIText dataset of 28,057 human and LLM-generated samples (GPT, LLaMA, and Claude) with a 60-20-20 split, DeBERTa-Sentinel achieves 98.21\% validation accuracy and surpasses the RoBERTa-Sentinel baseline from NeurIPS 2025, achieving 97.53\% test accuracy, 95.89\% precision, 99.33\% recall, and 99.53\% ROC-AUC, and maintaining a 0.665\% false negative rate. The model's interpretability reveals linguistic markers such as academic phrasing and formal transitions associated with synthetic text, directly supporting stakeholder needs for verifiable, auditable content-authenticity decisions. By advancing responsible detection methods that reduce bias and enhance explainability, DeBERTa-Sentinel promotes trustworthy, ethical, and human-centric AI systems. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Galileo-Galili/HUMAN-VS-AI-TEXT-DETECTION.
PurifAI, a proactive, model-agnostic, cache-level purification system designed for safety- and compliance-sensitive deployments, is presented, explicitly designed to preserve knowledge alignment with a pre-defined trusted knowledge core.
Guoqing Wang, Zhao Zhang, Zeyu Sun et al.· Annual International ACM SIG...· 0 citations
The 2nd SeT-LLM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Large Language Models brings together researchers and practitioners from data mining, machine learning, security, and responsible AI to address issues from a data-centric, system-level perspective.
Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen, Ting Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Detecting whether a jailbreak attack against a large language model (LLM) has succeeded is a challenging problem in AI security. Existing approaches rely on brittle string matching, expensive LLM-based judges, or task-specific classifiers that often fail to generalize. This paper investigates whether semantic coherence is sufficient to evaluate jailbreak success. In this work, we propose PRISM: Prompt-Response coherence for Identifying jailbreaks via Scoring Method, a lightweight method that models jailbreak detection as a coherence problem between the harmful prompt and the model response. The approach combines multiple semantic similarity signals within an ensemble of classical and simple machine learning models. Training in 3,480 pairs of prompt-responses from AdvBench, HarmBench and Alpaca, PRISM achieves F1 = 0.91 and AUC-ROC = 0.98 in the internal test set. In a held-out validation set of 694 labeled samples never seen during training, it outperforms six baseline attack success estimators, achieving the highest accuracy (0.746) and AUC-ROC (0.840), while being up to $\mathbf{1 6} \times$ faster than LLM-based methods. These results demonstrate that semantic coherence provides a robust and efficient signal for jailbreak detection, significantly reducing the implementation complexity of state-of-the-art approaches.
Costabile Di Gregorio, Lama Sleem, Jérôme François et al.· Annual International Compute...· 0 citations
A survey and comparative analysis of NLP-based Automatic Deception Detection focusing on the legal domain and the evolution from feature-based machine learning to Large Language Model (LLM) approaches are presented, showing strong domain sensitivity.
T. Samaradiwakara, Nisansa de Silva, George C. Lobb· 0 citations
A role-layer framework is introduced to unify LLM risks and defenses, and identifies three key open challenges: moving from static detection accuracy to budgeted ecosystem-level risk evaluation, hardening LLM-centered verification pipelines against adversarial manipulation, and deploying auditable human-in-the-loop verification systems for trustworthy real-world misinformation defense.