Aug 2026· Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences· Vol 38· 0 citations· 121 references
TL;DR
This survey offers a comprehensive overview of the main data security risks facing LLMs and reviews current defense strategies, including adversarial training, data cleaning, output guardrails, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, data augmentation, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)/agent defenses.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs), now a foundation in advancing natural language processing, power applications such as text generation, machine translation, and conversational systems. Despite their transformative potential, these models inherently rely on massive amounts of training data, often collected from diverse and uncurated sources, which exposes them to serious data security risks. Harmful or malicious data can compromise model behavior, leading to toxic outputs or hallucinations, while also creating vulnerabilities to data-driven attacks such as prompt injection and data poisoning. As LLMs continue to be integrated into critical real-world systems, understanding and addressing these data-centric security risks is imperative to safeguard user trust and system reliability. This survey offers a comprehensive overview of the main data security risks facing LLMs and reviews current defense strategies, including adversarial training, data cleaning, output guardrails, Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF), data augmentation, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)/agent defenses. Additionally, we categorize and analyze relevant datasets used for assessing robustness and security across different domains, providing guidance for future research. Finally, we highlight key research directions that focus on data provenance and traceability, verifiable machine forgetting, secure model updates, standardized evaluation framework, explainability-driven security analysis, and effective governance frameworks, aiming to promote the safe and responsible development of LLM technology. This work seeks to inform researchers, practitioners, and policymakers, driving progress toward data security in LLMs.
The 2nd SeT-LLM Workshop on Secure and Trustworthy Large Language Models brings together researchers and practitioners from data mining, machine learning, security, and responsible AI to address issues from a data-centric, system-level perspective.
Lu Lin, Jinghui Chen, Ting Wang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This thesis proposes a unified two-layer approach to enhancing the trustworthiness and security of LLM-enabled systems and introduces the Adaptive LLM Threat Response (ALTR) framework, which integrates behavioral anomaly detection, context-aware prompt classification, and temporal threat memory to identify and mitigate adversarial interactions in real time.
A four-layer taxonomy mapping 13 vulnerability types across perception, brain, action, and interaction layers is contributed, and seven open problems centered on containment are identified.
Md Jafrin Hossain, Mohammad Arif Hossain, Nirwan Ansari· 0 citations
A role-layer framework is introduced to unify LLM risks and defenses, and identifies three key open challenges: moving from static detection accuracy to budgeted ecosystem-level risk evaluation, hardening LLM-centered verification pipelines against adversarial manipulation, and deploying auditable human-in-the-loop verification systems for trustworthy real-world misinformation defense.
A detailed overview of the security risks associated with adversarial attacks is offered, including evasion attacks carried out at inference time, data poisoning that corrupts the training process, backdoor insertion that hides dormant triggers inside a model, and model inversion that leaks private information back out of a trained system.
Harsh Verma· International Journal of Sci...· 0 citations
This work proposes a novel jailbreak framework: YAE, which enhances the model's dependency on external information by constructing a RAG‐based knowledge base containing harmful Q&A content and leverages Guide MoE, a routing‐inspired prompting strategy, to guide the model toward alternative reasoning trajectories through expert‐role prompting and domain‐specific perturbations.