Skip to content
Review Open access

HUMAN–AI COLLABORATION IN CREATIVE CONTENT GENERATION

Aug 2026 · International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications · Vol 18, pp. 54-63 · 0 citations

TL;DR

A clear and incremental process in which each individual can maintain ownership of their own decisions about what to write and be ready to take responsibility for what they write, while the AI can offer them more avenues for exploration, faster iterations of revisions and test options.

Abstract

Generative AI is transforming the conceptual development and design of text, images, music and video ideas and variations – both in terms of real time efficiency and cost. Not in the creative ability of humans, though, but of DED. The outcome of human's activity and what they feed into their personal life, the assessment of them, responsibility, the decision to communicate each other with the scale changes and transformations made by the machine. For a miniproj, the human centric approach is suggested and proposed for the content generation: co-creation and creativity. Our stages are: Framing of the brief, independent/humanased seed, articulation of alternatives, AI, getting it to mature, getting it approved then released to the learning outcomes. Clearly identifies who's responsible for each and every step, and all elements of the provenance ledger –the sources, what the consents are, the model(s), model version(s), prompts, candidates, the editor, and who's doing the reviewing of the edit and ledger disclosure persons. Please use the design in writing, visual communication, campaign ideas and for production of educational media. Issues of originality, relevance, voice, factuality and accessibility/efficiency now come into the picture when it comes to quality and release gates. Controlled prototype – same prototype compared to Human (or non-human) (or both) prototype and same set of Briefs and same experts used and blinded during evaluation. Only illustrative results (not necessarily experimental result) indicated to show the propose analysis. The least successful creative engagement is to have the partners develop a project or if following the ‘quick and post' route. It's a clear and incremental process in which each individual can maintain ownership of their own decisions about what to write and be ready to take responsibility for what they write, while the AI can offer them more avenues for exploration, faster iterations of revisions and test options.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#generative ai Review Open access Sep 2026

Generative AI and the Reconfiguration of Creative Works in Short-Form Video Production: A Scoping Review

Generative AI is changing how short videos are created and is affecting the production, editing and collaboration of content. Existing research is scattered across various fields, such as technology application, creator practice and governance issues, and thus has not achieved all-round coverage of how generative artif...

Fang Yu · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Can the activity of large language models be considered creative work?

The article deals with implications of the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLM) for the understanding of the creative process using artificial intelligence (AI) and also discusses the new realities in the creative and educational spheres associated with it. The authors propose distinguishing creativity as a...

A. Vnutskikh, Andrey G. Kuznetsov, N. Okonskaya et al. · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Generative AI and Knowledge Management: A Multimodal Perspective on Knowledge Creation

The aim of this study is to explore the current state of 'AI vs AI' by generating a dataset comprising texts, images, audio and video, utilizing a set of freely available AI tools, based on a two-stage strategy.

Anastasiia Iufereva, Peter Mozelius · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Human-AI Collaboration: Designing Generative AI and Training Users to Engage in Collaborative Patterns

Generative AI (GenAI) applications are increasingly adopted in co-creative workflows, taking an active role in design and development tasks. GenAI offers unique opportunities through content generation and synthesis across resources, yet it can lead to losses in co-creativity, due to limited collaborative interactions...

Yvonne A. Farah, Michael C. Dorneich · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Expert Eyes, Machine Hands

This article explores how expert practitioners sustain, redefine, and sometimes resist aesthetic standards in an era of algorithmic co-creation of GenAI by identifying how expert practitioners sustain, redefine, and sometimes resist aesthetic standards in an era of algorithmic co-creation.

Angelique Nairn, Justin Matthews, Angela Asuncion et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Jun 2025

A Systematic Review of Artistic Human-AI Co-Creative Systems and Interaction Design

The co-creativity community is forging ahead with building more sophisticated and tailored systems to support and enhance human creativity. Design considerations or learnings from previous work can be an important and efficient starting point for this. To assist with that, we created a systematic literature review of 6...

Saloni Singh, Koen V. Hindriks, Dirk K. J. Heylen et al. · 23 citations · ⚡2

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.