Aug 2026· The Quarterly journal of medicine· Vol 119· 0 citations
TL;DR
A 12-week CR program significantly enhances LA function in HFrEF, indicating potential benefits in atrial mechanics and overall cardiac performance and larger studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes.
Abstract
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) involves impaired left ventricular systolic function and frequently affects left atrial (LA) performance, which plays a vital role in cardiac output and is an emerging prognostic marker. While cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves overall cardiac function, its impact on LA function in HFrEF patients remains under-investigated.
To evaluate the effect of a structured 12-week CR program on LA function in patients with HFrEF.
This prospective observational cohort study included 40 patients with HFrEF (mean age 53.6 ± 10.2 years, 87.5% male), LVEF ≤ 40%, and NYHA class I–II. Participants underwent a 12-week supervised CR program comprising exercise and lifestyle modifications at Ain Shams University Hospitals. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography was used to assess LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile strain at baseline and post-rehabilitation. Patients with significant valvular disease, residual ischemia, non-sinus rhythm, or poor adherence were excluded.
CR significantly improved LA strain parameters: reservoir strain increased from 20.5% ± 9.5 to 23.6% ± 8.0 (p = 0.004), conduit strain from –10.2% ± 6.0 to –11.6% ± 4.6 (p = 0.048), and contractile strain from –10.3% ± 5.8 to –12.0% ± 5.9 (p = 0.020). LVEF improved from 36.4% ± 3.5 to 40.7% ± 5.3 (p < 0.001), while changes in LA size and volume were minimal.
A 12-week CR program significantly enhances LA function in HFrEF, indicating potential benefits in atrial mechanics and overall cardiac performance. Larger studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes.
In obese HFpEF patients, LA strain is associated with NT-proBNP levels, while atrial stiffness is associated with NT-proBNP and functional capacity, and these parameters provide complementary information on hemodynamic burden and clinical status.
G. Mandoli, M. Lambardi, A. Capolongo et al.· International Journal of Car...· 0 citations
LA reservoir strain at peak workload has prognostic value for adverse outcomes in both HFpEF and HFrEF, with a significant interaction between HF phenotype and LA reservoir strain at peak workload.
Yu Yoshida, Y. Takaya, R. Nakayama et al.· International Journal of Car...· 0 citations
HRRI is significantly reduced in HFpEF and distinguishes patients with and without heart failure, and shows associations with echocardiographic markers of diastolic and longitudinal systolic dysfunction, exercise capacity, and H2FPEF score.
Andreea Dache, C. Văcărescu, Minodora Teodoru et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
LASI is a resting echocardiographic marker associated with positive DST and may help refine pre-test selection for DST among patients with suspected HFpEF, particularly those with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores.
Minkwan Kim, J. Seo, S. Bae et al.· Journal of the American Soci...· 0 citations
Background Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging because clinical findings may not reflect hemodynamic disease expression. Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LEDA (Left ventricular concentricity, E/e′, left ventricle-to-left at...
P. Palka, R. Hilling-Smith, B. Bell et al.· JACC: Advances· 0 citations
Differences between ischemic and non-ischemic HFrEF referred for device implantation differ in LV remodeling and LA function, and the between-group differences were small in absolute terms, with widely overlapping distributions.
M. Dąbrowska, M. Potapowicz-Krysztofiak, M. Kiliszek et al.· Journal of Clinical Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.