Skip to content

Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on left atrial function in patients with heart failure reduced ejection fraction

Aug 2026 · The Quarterly journal of medicine · Vol 119 · 0 citations

TL;DR

A 12-week CR program significantly enhances LA function in HFrEF, indicating potential benefits in atrial mechanics and overall cardiac performance and larger studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes.

Abstract

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) involves impaired left ventricular systolic function and frequently affects left atrial (LA) performance, which plays a vital role in cardiac output and is an emerging prognostic marker. While cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves overall cardiac function, its impact on LA function in HFrEF patients remains under-investigated. To evaluate the effect of a structured 12-week CR program on LA function in patients with HFrEF. This prospective observational cohort study included 40 patients with HFrEF (mean age 53.6 ± 10.2 years, 87.5% male), LVEF ≤ 40%, and NYHA class I–II. Participants underwent a 12-week supervised CR program comprising exercise and lifestyle modifications at Ain Shams University Hospitals. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography was used to assess LA reservoir, conduit, and contractile strain at baseline and post-rehabilitation. Patients with significant valvular disease, residual ischemia, non-sinus rhythm, or poor adherence were excluded. CR significantly improved LA strain parameters: reservoir strain increased from 20.5% ± 9.5 to 23.6% ± 8.0 (p = 0.004), conduit strain from –10.2% ± 6.0 to –11.6% ± 4.6 (p = 0.048), and contractile strain from –10.3% ± 5.8 to –12.0% ± 5.9 (p = 0.020). LVEF improved from 36.4% ± 3.5 to 40.7% ± 5.3 (p < 0.001), while changes in LA size and volume were minimal. A 12-week CR program significantly enhances LA function in HFrEF, indicating potential benefits in atrial mechanics and overall cardiac performance. Larger studies are needed to validate long-term outcomes.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Obesity and left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: OLA-HF registry.

In obese HFpEF patients, LA strain is associated with NT-proBNP levels, while atrial stiffness is associated with NT-proBNP and functional capacity, and these parameters provide complementary information on hemodynamic burden and clinical status.

G. Mandoli, M. Lambardi, A. Capolongo et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Heart Rate Recovery Index as a Functional Marker in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Associations with H2FPEF Score, Longitudinal Systolic Function and Left Atrial Remodelling

HRRI is significantly reduced in HFpEF and distinguishes patients with and without heart failure, and shows associations with echocardiographic markers of diastolic and longitudinal systolic dysfunction, exercise capacity, and H2FPEF score.

Andreea Dache, C. Văcărescu, Minodora Teodoru et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Left Atrial Stiffness Index for Refining Diastolic Stress Test Selection in Suspected Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

LASI is a resting echocardiographic marker associated with positive DST and may help refine pre-test selection for DST among patients with suspected HFpEF, particularly those with intermediate HFA-PEFF scores.

Minkwan Kim, J. Seo, S. Bae et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The LEDA Score

Background Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging because clinical findings may not reflect hemodynamic disease expression. Objectives The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LEDA (Left ventricular concentricity, E/e′, left ventricle-to-left at...

P. Palka, R. Hilling-Smith, B. Bell et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Etiology-Related Differences in Left Ventricular Remodeling and Left Atrial Function in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Referred for ICD/CRT Implantation

Differences between ischemic and non-ischemic HFrEF referred for device implantation differ in LV remodeling and LA function, and the between-group differences were small in absolute terms, with widely overlapping distributions.

M. Dąbrowska, M. Potapowicz-Krysztofiak, M. Kiliszek et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.