Skip to content
Preprint

ReProAgent: Tool-Augmented Multi-Stage Agentic Generation of Bug Reproduction Tests from Issue Reports

Jul 2026 · 1 citation · 57 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

ReProAgent is a multi-stage agent framework for reproduction test generation from issue reports that decomposes the task into four agent stages: bug localization, root cause analysis, test planning, and test generation, and generalizes across multiple backbone LLMs.

Abstract

Reproduction tests help developers confirm reported issues and provide executable feedback for issue resolution, yet issue reports in open-source projects rarely include such tests. Recent studies have explored generating issue reproduction tests from issue reports with large language models, but existing approaches largely rely on prompt-based pipelines that retrieve textual context and generate tests. This limits their ability to understand how reported issues behave in repository-scale codebases and to flexibly organize the construction of reproduction tests. In this paper, we propose ReProAgent, a multi-stage agent framework for reproduction test generation from issue reports. ReProAgent decomposes the task into four agent stages: bug localization, root cause analysis, test planning, and test generation. To support these stages, ReProAgent integrates task-specific tools for task decomposition and reflection, context retrieval from both textual sources and repository graphs, and runtime interaction with the execution environment. Experiments on SWT-bench-lite and SWT-bench-verified show that ReProAgent successfully reproduces 58.43% and 70.30% of issues, outperforming all baselines, with an average cost of $0.14 per instance. For example, when equipped with GPT-5-mini, ReProAgent exceeds OpenHands with the same backbone by 20.43 and 7.90 percentage points, respectively. ReProAgent also generalizes across multiple backbone LLMs and improves downstream issue resolution performance when integrated with existing repair approaches.

View source

Similar papers

Book Open access Jul 2026

TestAgent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Repository-Level Unit Test Generation

TestAgent, a multi-agent tool implemented as a VS Code extension that automates the generation of high-quality unit tests for Java projects using repository-level Code Knowledge Graphs, demonstrates its practical utility for regression testing and bug discovery.

Ye Shang, Quanjun Zhang, Zheng Zhan et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

TDD-Agent: Test-Driven Reasoning for Code Generation

TDD-Agent is introduced, which operationalizes the test-driven development paradigm for code generation and improves not only code correctness but also the effectiveness of the generated tests, yielding higher pass rates, coverage, and mutation scores, suggesting that tests can serve as evolving reasoning artifacts rather than fixed validators.

Hong Yu, Ke-Shen Li, Jiakun Li et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Unified Issue Resolution Benchmark for Requirement Clarification, Planning, and Code Generation for Coding Agents

SWE-RPG is introduced, a repository-level benchmark that combines executable patch evaluation with validated ground-truth references (GTs) for Requirement Clarification and Implementation Planning, and suggests implicit-requirement recovery as a key candidate direction for improving coding agents.

Xin Zhou, C. Chong, Kisub Kim et al. · 0 citations
Review Jul 2026

Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration for Unit Test Generation via Human-Testing-Inspired Workflows

TestAgent is proposed, an LLM-based test generation approach that addresses the above limitations by emulating human testing practices via a multi-agent collaboration mechanism and equips TestAgent with a set of tool APIs that can be invoked dynamically in an on-demand and adaptive manner.

Quanjun Zhang, Ye Shang, Siqi Gu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Knowledge-Guided Synthetic Bug Feedback for LLM-Based Unit Test Generation

Large language models (LLMs) have opened new opportunities for unit test generation, but executable tests do not necessarily reveal real defects. This paper studies how historical real-bug mechanisms can be transformed into executable feedback targets for LLM-based unit test generation. The proposed framework constructs structural and semantic representations of real-bug records, retrieves mechanisms applicable to a focal method, and instantiates them as synthetic bugs that guide iterative test enhancement. We evaluate the approach on method-level real-bug detection tasks from Defects4J and show that mechanism-guided synthetic-bug feedback improves real-bug detection over execution-, coverage-, mutation-, knowledge-, and search-based baselines. The results suggest that organizing real-bug mechanisms as retrievable and executable feedback targets is an effective way to guide generated tests toward bug-triggering inputs and behavioral oracles.

Ziheng Wang, Maike Li, Chen Zhi · 0 citations