Skip to content

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

From Exposure to Expectation: Frequency, Surprisal, and Language Across Development in Spanish

Surprisal, the negative log-probability a language model assigns to a word given its preceding context, reliably predicts adult reading times. Does it contribute as much to explaining when children acquire individual words? Frequency reflects a learner's cumulative exposure to a word, whereas surprisal reflects how pre...

Francisco López · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Large Language Models as Distributional Baselines for Language Tasks

The central contributions of this paper articulate the conditions under which distributional predictability threatens the internal validity of an experiment and provide concrete recommendations for how to control for this potential confound.

Sean Trott, James A. Michaelov, Cameron R. Jones et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Chronologic: Measuring Language Models'Ability to Represent the Past

Language models are appealing tools for research on the past. But to trust the evidence a model provides, researchers need to know whether its responses fit the period represented. Validation is challenging, because this is not a task living people ordinarily perform, and because many questions have multiple correct an...

Ted Underwood, Zi-Liang Qiu, Sarah Griebel et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Revisiting the Estimation of Unigram Surprisal in Computational Psycholinguistics

Contextual and unigram surprisal are standard predictors of reading time in computational psycholinguistics. While contextual surprisal is typically derived from neural language models, unigram surprisal is usually obtained from independent corpus counts. Although both quantities are deterministic functionals of a sing...

Z. Hopton, F. Re, Samuel Kiegeland et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.