Jul 2026· ShodhKosh Journal of Visual and Performing Arts· Vol 7, pp. 217-223· 0 citations· 5 references
TL;DR
This paper examines the intersection of Vedic performing arts including oral recitation, ritual enactment, and commentarial pedagogy with the computational and archival tools of Digital Humanities and calls for a human-centered framework of digital mediation that holds together accessibility and philosophical depth, archival innovation and cultural accountability.
Abstract
Vedic philosophy is not merely a textual inheritance, it is a living performance tradition, inseparable from sound, breath, ritual gesture, and the relational space between teacher and student. The emergence of Digital Humanities as a dominant paradigm for the preservation and dissemination of classical knowledge systems raises questions that are particularly acute for this tradition. This paper examines the intersection of Vedic performing arts including oral recitation, ritual enactment, and commentarial pedagogy with the computational and archival tools of Digital Humanities. It argues that digital platforms and artificial intelligence, while enabling unprecedented access to rare Vedic resources, simultaneously risk severing philosophical content from its performative ground. The paper further investigates the role of English as a mediating language within global knowledge circuits, proposing that translation must be understood as an ethical and interpretive act rather than a mechanical transfer. Drawing on posthuman theory, postcolonial epistemology, and media studies, this paper calls for a human-centered framework of digital mediation that holds together accessibility and philosophical depth, archival innovation and cultural accountability.
This study re-examines the theological concept of the Imago Dei (Image of God), particularly its biblical grounding in Genesis 1:26–27, as an interpretive framework for understanding these transformations. The study employs a qualitative, interpretive, literature-based methodology that brings theological anthropology into conversation with philosophy of technology and contemporary higher education scholarship. Sources were identified through a structured search and selection process, examined against explicit relevance criteria, and synthesised through thematic analysis. Four themes emerged from the interdisciplinary literature: human agency and dignity, cognitive formation and externalisation, digitally mediated identity and authorship, and ethical-relational formation. The findings indicate that AI can augment learning and creativity but may also encourage cognitive dependence, blur conventional understandings of authorship, and intensify the tendency to evaluate students through measurable digital outputs. Contemporary higher education scholarship similarly emphasises the importance of human agency, critical engagement, ethical governance, and responsible AI literacy. The study argues that the Imago Dei provides a constructive theological framework to ensure that AI remains a means of supporting, rather than replacing, human intellectual, moral, relational, and spiritual formation. The paper proposes a human-centred model of AI integration in higher education grounded in dignity, agency, discernment, relationality, and holistic formation.
Abigail Kerubo Osoro· Journal of Philosophy and Re...· 0 citations
This article reconceptualizes Global Citizenship Education (GCE) as a humane lacuna, a porous, searching interval where competing claims to justice press against one another. In this rendering, GCE becomes an ethical orientation toward uncertainty. An openness, a willingness to dwell with the fragile, the plural, the not-yet-coherent. Through the SCALE heuristic—skepticism, connection, allosyncrasy, liminality, and expression—the article offers both an analytic framework and a pedagogical grammar that orients practice within such a space. Empirically grounded in constructivist analyses of teacher–student dialogue, it demonstrates how ethical understanding emerges reflexively and dialogically. In a theoretical sense, Stewart Brand’s Pace Layers elucidate the layered temporalities shaping moral formation. These lenses foreground relationality, temporality, and endurance, challenging technocratic and universalist models. The humane lacuna therefore re-situates normativity within lived encounter and layered time, offering educators an alternative means of grappling with global complexity.
This article examines how performative forms of digital communication contribute to the production and normalization of political reality under authoritarian and hybrid political conditions, with Georgia as the primary contextual frame. Drawing on Michel Foucault’s theories of productive power and governmentality, Erika Fischer-Lichte’s performance theory, and Branislav Jakovljević’s analysis of event, script, and actors in the theatre of war, the study combines conceptual analysis with in-depth interviews with seven experts in political science, cybersecurity, media and communication, international relations, human rights, social psychology, and performing arts. The thematic analysis identified six interconnected mechanisms: Performative Camouflage, perceived authenticity and trust formation, affective activation, audience co-production, algorithmic amplification, and normalization of political reality. The article introduces Performative Camouflage to describe the circulation of politically consequential meanings through communicative forms that may appear personal, professional, cultural, educational, protective, or otherwise not primarily political. The findings suggest that digital political influence emerges through recursive interactions among performers, audiences, platforms, affect, and unequal communicative resources rather than through isolated messages alone. The study distinguishes political function from unverified strategic intention or organizational coordination and emphasizes the ambivalence of digital participation, which can support both political control and democratic resistance. It proposes the Digital Theatre of War as an analytical model for examining these processes.
George Salukvadze· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
This article offers a hermeneutic-cultural reading of Satoshi Kon’s Paprika (2006) as a work that critically examines the relationship among dreams, technology, culture industry, and digital subjectivity. Drawing on theories of representation, culture industry, audience studies, mediatization, and Maturana's reflections on language and relational domains, the article analyzes how technological mediations participate in the configuration of desires, imaginaries, and contemporary forms of self-perception. It argues that, although audiences retain margins for interpretation and resignification, these margins become more complex in a digital culture where the very contexts of reception are shaped by platforms, audiovisual flows, and algorithmic logics of visibility. Paprika is thus interpreted as a critical device for examining the dream as a territory mediated by narratives, screens, and cultural forms of subjective production.
A. Acevedo-Merlano· Frontiers in Communication· 0 citations