Skip to content

VANTAGE-Bench: Evaluating the Infrastructure AI Gap in Vision-Language Models

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 45 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

VANTAGE-Bench is introduced, a benchmark measuring the "Infrastructure AI Gap", which spans three operational domains, unifies image and video evaluation across semantic, spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal capabilities, and moves beyond multiple-choice to eight task formulations including dense captioning and spatio-temporal grounding.

Abstract

As Vision-Language Models (VLMs) advance toward physical deployment, the focus has remained on action-oriented Embodied AI evaluated on subject-centric consumer video. This overlooks a pervasive class of Physical AI: Infrastructure AI, which relies on fixed cameras for open-loop insights like safety monitoring and operational logging. We introduce VANTAGE-Bench, a benchmark measuring this"Infrastructure AI Gap."It spans three operational domains (Logistics, Transportation, and Smart Spaces), unifies image and video evaluation across semantic, spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal capabilities, and moves beyond multiple-choice to eight task formulations including dense captioning and spatio-temporal grounding. It adds a single-pass trajectory protocol for Single Object Tracking and, to our knowledge, the first such evaluation on fixed-camera infrastructure video, scored against specialist trackers. Annotation spans three regimes over 3,346 media assets: 3,342 video-task annotations, 4,281 image-grounding annotations, and 27,404 detection boxes. Evaluating 17 models zero-shot, we find the shortfall relative to consumer-centric benchmarks is concentrated, not general. Event verification, referring expressions, and temporal localization fall roughly 9 to 24 points at every model scale, while video question answering stays within 5.3 points of VideoMME and 2D spatial pointing shows no shortfall against BLINK. The temporal pillar is weakest in absolute terms: no system exceeds 55.7 mIoU on temporal localization or 37.3 SODA_c on dense video captioning. On tracking, frontier models come within roughly 5 points of specialist trackers over short horizons but separate as the horizon extends. Open-weight models lead 2D object localization outright, so neither scale nor proprietary access explains the pattern. Data, evaluation harness, and leaderboard: https://vantage-bench.org/

View source

Similar papers

Conference Aug 2026

SFC-VLM: Single-Frame Compression of Temporal Information for Robotics Vision-Language Model

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are effective at static image reasoning, but existing VLM-based safety systems remain biased toward static posture recognition (e.g., lying or sitting) rather than dynamic event understanding. In robotics, this distinction is critical because recognizing a state alone is insufficient to de...

Seung-Ho Han, Kooksung Jun, Deok-Won Lee · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

CoVLM-Bench: A Real-World Benchmark for Cooperative Driving Question Answering and Planning

Vision-language models (VLMs) have made substantial progress in autonomous driving, but their success has primarily been studied in ego-centric scenes. Infrastructure-side observations provide views beyond the ego vehicle's field of view, yet conventional cooperative-driving systems typically transform them into geomet...

Kang Yang, Shuai-Yu Liu, Han-Sen Li et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

TempoGround: State-Aware Streaming Visual Grounding with Vision-Language Models

A VLM-native framework that detects cross-frame object correspondence and explicitly models object presence states, thereby enabling accurate and consistent visual grounding under streaming inputs, and introduces Streaming Grounding Reinforcement (SGR), which optimizes TempoGround with verifiable Grounding, Identity, a...

Le-Qian Ding, Jun-Ning Qiu, Man-Wen Yang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Oct 2026

SpaTime: Streaming Vision-Language Models for Spatio-temporal Reasoning

Embodied agents must reason about 3D space while the video is still arriving, answering questions as soon as they have observed enough of the scene. VLMs that incorporate 3D geometric priors achieve strong spatial reasoning, but they operate offline, i.e., the full video must be available before they produce an answer....

Hai-Rong Yin, Huang-Ying Zhan, Shin-Fang Chng et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

StreamPI: Streaming Multimodal Temporal Modeling for Vision-Language-Action Models

StreamPI is proposed, a streaming multimodal temporal modeling framework that equips single-frame VLA with temporal reasoning capability without introducing any additional parameters and seamlessly inherits pretrained single-frame weights and supports flexible single-frame and multi-frame inference.

Zhe Liu, Jing-Hua Hou, Yuxiang Lu et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MVVBench: Benchmarking 4D Reasoning in Vision-Language Models

Preliminary evidence is presented that reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards can elicit some latent multi-view competence in the base model, pointing to training-time approaches as a promising direction for future work.

Hyungjin Chung, Byeongjun Park, Joonseok Lee et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.