Public procurement affects the transparency, accountability, efficiency of public institutions, competition and effectiveness of public resources, and is therefore an important dimension of public-sector governance. In the last 20 years, Pakistan has taken several steps towards reform in Procurement by introducing the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) in 2002 and the Public Procurement Rules in 2004. Even with these reforms, issues of implementation gaps, institutional capacity, compliance, monitoring, and effectiveness of governance mechanisms persist. This research paper will discuss the trends in public procurement reforms of Pakistan and its effect on public governance and institutional performance in Pakistan. The study uses a qualitative policy analysis design, through systematic analysis of documents/sources of secondary data, such as laws, procurement rules, policy documents, institutional reports, audit reports and relevant literature of scholars. The results have shown that Pakistan has achieved significant progress in the development of a formal procurement regulatory framework, in enhancing transparency and accountability in procurement, in improving the professionalism of procurement functions and in introducing digital procurement by electronic systems. The analysis also reveals, however, that a number of shortcomings exist between formal policy provisions and institutional implementation. The capacity of institutions, compliance, monitoring and coordination difficulties, as well as the adaptation to technological reforms remain constraining the performance of procurement. The study findings suggest that the success of future reform of public procurement will depend less on adding more regulations and more on ensuring greater institutional capacity, professional skills, monitoring, enforcement, digital infrastructure, and accountability. The study advances the literature on reforms in public procurement by emphasizing the need to view the process of public procurement reform not as a regulatory process, but as an institutional and governance transformation process.
This paper explores the role of administrative capacity building in strengthening Nigeria’s public
institutions within the framework of globalization. Employing a qualitative, descriptive, and
analytical methodology, the research analyzes secondary data from academic literature,
government policy documents, and inte...
J. Ahmed· JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRA...· 0 citations
This study develops an administrative-governance perspective on the role of legislative oversight in strengthening public accountability within the strategic sectors supervised by Commission VII of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) for the 2024–2029 period. Strategic sectors include industry, micro, smal...
J. Jamhari, Priyanto Priyanto, D. Ferriswara· Green Social: International...· 0 citations
Public procurement constitutes a cornerstone of public financial management, representing a significant proportion
of government expenditure across developed and developing economies alike. Despite decades of regulatory reform, public
procurement systems continue to grapple with persistent challenges of corruption, ine...
Adebọwale A. Adedokun· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
The effectiveness of institutions, governance, and the rule of law remains fundamental to Nigeria's democratic consolidation, socio-economic development, and national security. Despite numerous constitutional provisions, institutional reforms, and governance initiatives, concerns persist regarding weak institutional ca...
Ahmed Tanimu Mahmoud· ADSU International Journal o...· 0 citations
The integration of public policy and governance structures is a crucial factor for a state’s
effectiveness in international politics. Countries that maintain coherence between domestic policy
frameworks and governance institutions are better positioned to pursue their diplomatic objectives
and protect national inter...
L. Arugu· JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE...· 0 citations
Public procurement is highly vulnerable to corruption because it involves substantial public expenditure, considerable administrative discretion, fragmented institutional responsibilities, and technically complex contracting processes. Although recent anti-corruption reforms have increasingly focused on transparency, d...
Ismael Hellwas, Khamees Abdullah Abdullah, Hameed Hammadi et al.· Nusantara· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.