Connectomics is used to map the cell types and synaptic connections underlying a form of multi-layer continual learning that cancels predictable sensory responses in a cerebellum-like structure in electric fish, highlighting the potential of connectomics, in combination with cell-type-specific physiological recordings and computational modelling, for deciphering learning in neural circuits.
Abstract
Many forms of learning, for example, learning a model of the environment or a motor skill, rely on synaptic plasticity that is widely distributed across cell types and network stages. Understanding how this distributed plasticity functions is a central challenge in neuroscience1-5. Here we use connectomics to map the cell types and synaptic connections underlying a form of multi-layer continual learning that cancels predictable sensory responses in a cerebellum-like structure in electric fish6,7. Our analysis shows inhibitory and disinhibitory sensory input pathways that fulfil theoretical requirements for instructing synaptic plasticity8,9, structured synaptic connectivity between network stages that solves a credit assignment problem and structured recurrent connectivity that accelerates sensory prediction and cancellation. A computational model constrained by electrophysiological recordings shows how this synaptic connectivity ensures that multiple sites of plasticity cooperate to overcome their individual limitations, resulting in cancellation that is fast, accurate and robust to noise. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of connectomics, in combination with cell-type-specific physiological recordings and computational modelling, for deciphering learning in neural circuits.
Learning requires the brain to link experience to lasting changes in neural activity, yet most experiences unfold over timescales far longer than those of classical synaptic plasticity mechanisms. Behavioral timescale synaptic plasticity (BTSP) has emerged as a candidate mechanism that bridges this gap by enabling rapi...
L. Wilmerding, Fox Gourianova, Christine Grienberger· Current Research in Neurobio...· 0 citations
Neural-network simulations suggest that volume-transmitted excitatory signals can improve associative memory retrieval in sparsely connected networks and point to a potential computational consequence of glutamate spillover for brain circuit function.
O. Kopach, James P. Reynolds, Thomas P. Jensen et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
FlyWire connectome-constrained whole-brain model is fitted to calcium recordings of spontaneous activity in head-fixed Drosophila, showing that spontaneous activity is not distributed uniformly across the connectome, but is organized by a compact neuropil core.
Qian-Zhu Li, Wen-Hao Ping, Ke Zhang et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Myelin regulates neural signaling not only by enabling fast conduction but also by dynamically tuning axonal conduction velocity (CV) and thereby shaping spike timing. While activity‐dependent myelination is thought to optimize neural communication, how changes in myelin translate into altered single‐cell dyna...
Daniel O'Sullivan, Aref Pariz, Daniel Trotter et al.· Glia· 0 citations
Determining the amount of information a neuron receives per unit of time is key to understanding brain connectivity and how neural networks encode and transmit information. In particular, estimating this information flow by distinguishing between excitatory and inhibitory synaptic contributions is critical to understan...
R. M. Delicado-Moll, A. Guillamón, A. E. Teruel et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.