The Paradox of the Third Particle arises when particles are described relative to one of them serving as a reference frame. Although it is typically attributed to quantum superpositions, we show that the paradox and its ramifications$\unicode{x2014}$such as the relativity of subsystems$\unicode{x2014}$already occur classically. In light of this insight, we establish a no-go theorem that holds whenever physical subsystems, whether classical or quantum, are used as reference frames: if one demands that frame transformations be information-preserving, then it is impossible to meaningfully partition the world into subsystems, like individual particles, from the perspective of each frame.
The assertion that quantum states of same-type particles have to be symmetrized because they are indistinguishable has led to a debate in the foundations of quantum mechanics around topics like “thisness” of particles and “surplus structure” in spaces of quantum states. We analyze the underlying mathematical notions an...
In a complete quantum theory, one would construct it based on what we can observe in a system and operationally define in our universe. This philosophy goes back to some of the original ideals of quantum theory defined by W. Heisenberg, N. Bohr, and others as part of the Copenhagen school of thought. We argue in this l...
We propose that quantum mechanics emerges as the effective description of a deterministic physical reality from the perspective of an internal observer that constitutes a subsystem of a finite closed world. Because such an observer cannot access the complete ontological state of the world to which it belongs, its descr...
A. Belinsky, Alexandr Kaminsky· Laser Physics Letters· 0 citations
In quantum physics it is commonplace to model the interaction of remote systems with a many-body Hamiltonian. Taking such an action-at-a-distance description {\it \`a la lettre} leads to various paradoxes related to faster-than-light communication and apparent inconsistencies in local energy accounting. It also neglect...
N. Gisin, S. Massar, Jef Pauwels et al.· 0 citations
Non-relativistic classical physics can be considered from a contextual perspective. At fi rst glance, the difference between classical physics (including special relativity) and quantum physics lies in the fact that the latter is indeterministic – that is, in general, the context of a quantum event cannot be controlled...
I. Pris· Siberian Journal of Philosop...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.