Skip to content
#explainable ai Open access

The Psychology of AI Dependency: A Conceptual Analysis of Cognitive Offloading and Human Decision-Making in the Generative AI Era

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Law Management & Humanities · 0 citations · 5 references

Abstract

The widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed the way people acquire knowledge, solve problems, and make decisions in both academic and professional settings. While these technologies improve efficiency and accessibility, their growing use has raised important psychological concerns regarding excessive reliance on AI for cognitive tasks. One emerging issue is AI dependency, where individuals increasingly shift mental effort to AI systems, a process commonly described as cognitive offloading. This study presents a conceptual analysis of how sustained engagement with generative AI may influence human thinking, reasoning, and decision-making. Drawing upon theories from cognitive psychology, distributed cognition, metacognition, and human–AI interaction, the paper examines the psychological mechanisms through which generative AI encourages the transfer of cognitive effort from individuals to intelligent systems. It further explores the potential impact of this shift on critical thinking, independent problem-solving, cognitive autonomy, and the quality of human decision-making. The study also discusses the circumstances under which cognitive offloading can serve as a beneficial strategy for improving efficiency, as well as the conditions in which prolonged dependence on AI may gradually weaken essential cognitive skills. Particular attention is given to factors such as user expertise, task complexity, and patterns of AI use that may shape these outcomes. By integrating insights from existing interdisciplinary literature, this paper develops a comprehensive conceptual framework explaining the relationship between generative AI use, cognitive offloading, and psychological dependency. The study aims to provide a theoretical foundation for future empirical research while offering practical insights for educators, technology developers, and policymakers seeking to encourage responsible AI use, strengthen AI literacy, and preserve human cognitive autonomy in an increasingly AI-driven society.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Open access Sep 2026

Thinking with AI or Thinking Less? A Narrative Review of Generative AI Dependence, Cognitive Offloading, and Human Cognitive Functioning

A key finding of this review is that whether GenAI is used at all is less critical than which functions are offloaded, which are maintained, and the extent to which users remain epistemically responsible for the resulting output.

Deva Adithiya L.M.D, Samarawickrema N. S., Peiris J. A. H. L. et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Rethinking Cognitive Bias in Human–AI Cognitive Systems: A Structured Conceptual Mapping Review

Research in cognitive psychology has long shown that human judgment and decision making are systematically influenced by cognitive biases, particularly under conditions of uncertainty. As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become increasingly embedded in socially relevant decision making contexts—such as healthcare,...

A. C. Jacomuzzi, Brigitta Pia Alioto, Sara Magni · 0 citations
#human-computer interacti... Preprint Sep 2026

The Dynamic Organization of Sustained Human-AI Cognition: From Construct-Level Change to Relational Structure

A dynamic cognitive organization framework is proposed that shifts analysis from construct-level change to relational organization anchored in the person's current task-cognitive state under sustained AI participation, and proposes a path-specific recursive principle whereby interaction outcomes, costs, and experiences...

Zi-Jian Ru · 0 citations
Sep 2026

When the Machine Is Ready but the Mind Is Not: Designing Organizations for Human Capacity in the Age of AI

Abstract: As artificial intelligence adoption accelerates across enterprises, organizations confront an unexpected constraint: not technological readiness, but human cognitive capacity. While 79 percent of organizations have adopted generative AI, only 39 percent report measurable business impact, suggesting implementa...

Jonathan H. Westover · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

From Answer Generation to Cognitive Partnership

Generative artificial intelligence is frequently evaluated through outcomes such as efficiency, accuracy, productivity, and task performance. This conceptual paper shifts attention from what AI produces to how sustained interaction with generative systems may reorganize human thinking. The Cognitive Partnership Cycle i...

Allison Page · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.