Skip to content
Book Open access

Evidencing LLM Misuse: A Hands-on Forensic Tutorial on Copyright Infringement and Plagiarism Detection

Aug 2026 · Proceedings of the 32nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V.2 · pp. 13293-13294 · 0 citations · 9 references

TL;DR

This tutorial presents a unified forensic perspective on LLM content misuse, combining hands-on copyright-risk auditing with a flexible plagiarism module, and equips attendees with practical and conceptual tools for auditing black-box models, interpreting similarity evidence, and understanding content misuse beyond simple text matching.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) introduce serious risks of content misuse, spanning copyright infringement in the legal domain and plagiarism in the ethical and academic domain. Although prior work has studied these risks, researchers and practitioners still need practical ways to audit, interpret, and evidence them. This tutorial presents a unified forensic perspective on LLM content misuse. First, we introduce Copyright Detective, an interactive forensic system for detecting, analyzing, and visualizing potential copyright leakage in LLM outputs. Participants will learn how inference-time scaling reveals sporadic memorization under output uncertainty, and how persuasive jailbreak probing can serve as defensive red teaming for examining alignment-suppressed leakage. Second, we introduce LLM Plagiarism Detection, covering verbatim copying, paraphrased reuse, and idea-level appropriation. We will discuss, and where appropriate demonstrate, how candidate source retrieval and text alignment support plagiarism analysis, while highlighting factors such as model size, decoding strategies, and fine-tuning corpus similarity. By combining hands-on copyright-risk auditing with a flexible plagiarism module, this tutorial equips attendees with practical and conceptual tools for auditing black-box models, interpreting similarity evidence, and understanding content misuse beyond simple text matching.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Whitewashing Hate, Smearing Harmless Content: Annotator-Style Rebuttal Attacks on LLM-Based Moderation

A rejudge protocol is introduced that extends direct contradiction with decision-boundary perturbations and adversarial rationales to address the susceptibility of initially correct model judgments to annotator-style rebuttals and whether attack effectiveness differs across manipulation directions.

Junyu Lu, Kaiyuan Liu, Kai-Chun Wang et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Dissecting Agentic Forensics: The Role of Triage, Prompting, and Evidence Arbitration in Open-World Fake Image Detection

Image forensics is increasingly an open-world problem: manipulations range from fully synthetic images to localized edits, splicing and swapping, while most forensic detectors remain specialized to a single manipulation family. Agentic AI has recently emerged as a promising solution. In principle, such systems can asse...

Xian-Long Li, Pietro Bongini, N. Pancino et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

The Innocent Courier: Covert Exfiltration Through Legitimate LLM Web Fetching

With the increasing capabilities of Large-Language-Models (LLMs) and LLM-based agents, users are increasingly using them to solve everyday problems, such as answering e-mails or providing programming support. Existing work has extensively investigated security and privacy risks, such as prompt injections and the disclo...

Alessandro Pegoraro, Daryan Merx, P. Rieger et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.