Jul 2026· Human-Intelligent Systems Integration· 0 citations· 29 references
TL;DR
This paper investigates the security requirements of CPHS encompassing confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, and authorization, in the context of CPHS, and systematically categorize and analyze attack vectors across three dimensions that can impact the security and trustworthiness of CPHS.
Abstract
Cyber-physical-human systems (CPHS) integrate human inputs, behaviors, and interfaces for a more effective utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted cyber and physical systems. However, the growing reliance on
Agentic AI
, coupled with the inherent variability of human actions, can introduce unforeseen security challenges. Studies have reported that any security compromise can result in catastrophic failures, safety hazards, and data breaches, disrupting the day-to-day operations of CPHS. Given the scale and complexity of typical CPHS, robust security measures are essential. This paper investigates the security requirements of CPHS encompassing confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, and authorization, in the context of CPHS. We also emphasize the role of formal verification methods to establish and guarantee the trustworthiness of agents, which are increasingly integral to these systems. Considering the inherent mutual dependency, we systematically categorize and analyze attack vectors across three dimensions:
data
,
agents
, and
human actors
that can impact the security and trustworthiness of CPHS. Using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in the defense sector as a prototypical CPHS engineering application, we present a typical mission scenario involving a remotely piloted Medium-Altitude, Long-Endurance (MALE) aircraft designed for Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance (ISTAR) to conduct threat assessments. Our comprehensive analysis illustrates how these attack vectors can compromise each dimension, providing actionable insights for security engineers and system architects to design robust security measures in CPHS.
It is found that traditional risk assessment and testing approaches are insufficient for AI-powered CPS, and a prototype implementation and experimental evaluation are presented along with a case study of protecting a smart manufacturing plant during a ransomware attack using the proposed approach.
Vikram Kulothungan, Deepti Gupta, Raju Dhakal et al.· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
Complex cyber-attacks, privacy sensitive threats and distributed intrusion are becoming more common against Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), which are the enablers of and underlying smart manufacturing, industrial Internet of Things, healthcare monitoring, and intelligent automation. Older, centralized intrusion detection...
Subrhamanyam Kolusu, S. Polisetty, M. Srinivas et al.· 2026 6th International Confe...· 0 citations
Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are becoming smart, autonomous, and cooperative systems that monitor, make adaptive decisions, and communicate resiliently in real time. The development of 5G networks, Industrial CPSs (IoT-enabled smart infrastructure), self-adaptive architectures, advanced data science platforms, and hum...
V. Shobhitha, A. Rajesh, C. Ramakristanaiah· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
The literature review indicates that AI can improve cybersecurity threat detection and legal information processing but also introduces risks involving inaccurate outputs, malicious use, manipulated information, transparency, and accountability, which support continued development of AI systems that are secure, transpa...
A Security-by-Design and risk-based certification framework that combines a six-layer IoT-AI reference architecture with STRIDE-based threat analysis augmented to capture AI-specific threats, including prompt injection and data poisoning is proposed.
Iván Ortiz-Garcés, Roberto O. Andrade· Future Internet· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.