2026· IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing· Vol 64, pp. 4413920-4413920· 0 citations· 57 references
Abstract
In understory terrain research, high-precision photon point cloud classification is essential for comprehensive analysis of forest ecosystems. However, ICESat-2/Advanced Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) photon data contain substantial noise, and the raw photon data lack explicit terrain attributes, which can lead to the misclassification of noise photons as ground signals and reduce terrain-extraction accuracy. To overcome this challenge, we develop a deep learning framework that fuses a dynamic graph convolutional neural network (DGCNN) with a convolutional block attention module (CBAM), enabling robust classification of ICESat-2 photon point clouds into ground, canopy, canopy top, and noise categories. Across three contrasting forest regions—California, South Carolina, and Puerto Rico—the proposed framework consistently outperformed NASA’s official algorithm and density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN). Using digital terrain model (DTM)/digital surface model (DSM) as reference, the average <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$F1$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-scores were 0.85 (macro) and 0.87 (weighted); using manual reference, they were 0.77 (macro) and 0.81 (weighted). For understory terrain estimation, the extracted ground photons achieved an average R2 of 0.99 and an average root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.70 m, outperforming FABDEM (R<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${}^{2} = 0.99$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, RMSE = 4.99 m) and Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) (R<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${}^{2} = 0.99$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, RMSE = 9.05 m). These results demonstrate the strong capability of the proposed model for photon point cloud classification and precise understory terrain recovery.
Spatially continuous quantification of forest above-ground biomass (AGB) is what makes carbon accounting credible and mitigation strategies actionable. While field inventories provide high localized accuracy, they are spatially sparse; conversely, spaceborne LiDAR from the Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI)...
Pann Thinzar Seint, Bryan Atwood, S. Chhatkuli· 0 citations
Abstract. Bare-earth Digital Terrain Models (DTMs) are fundamental to geospatial applications, yet publicly accessible global elevation products are Digital Surface Models (DSMs) with vertical accuracies of 4–15 m RMSE at 30 m or coarser resolution. Airborne LiDAR achieves sub-metre accuracy but remains costly and spat...
Xiandong Cai, Matthew D. Wilson· The International Archives o...· 0 citations
Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) is currently one of the most advanced spaceborne lidar systems, and its data have been widely applied in ocean bathymetry research. However, due to atmospheric scattering, water refraction, and other factors, its data contain substantial noise. Consequently, acquiri...
Jiao-Yu Hao, Jie Li, Yu-Jie Zhang et al.· IEEE Journal of Selected Top...· 0 citations
Accurate extraction of sea ice extent is of great importance for climate research, maritime navigation safety, and marine environmental monitoring. Traditional optical remote sensing methods are often limited by insufficient feature representation, while conventional machine-learning evaluations may overestimate classi...
Qing-Yan Bao, Mei-Zhen Bi, Jia-Chen Liu et al.· IEEE Journal of Selected Top...· 0 citations
Gaofen-1/Gaofen-6 (GF1/GF6) wide-field-view (WFV) imagery provides repeated wide-area observations for regional surface-water monitoring, but its use is complicated by fragmented water patterns, vegetation–water mixtures, terrain and cloud shadows, and cross-scene radiometric variability. This study presents a seven-ch...
Jia-Li Shao, Ming Yan, Zhao-Di Guo et al.· Remote Sensing· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.