Sep 2026· ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology· 0 citations· 86 references
TL;DR
This work introduces Fairabel, a novel approach that repairs fairness by mutating the training data under the guidance of causal models and multi-objective optimization, and shows that Fairabel reduces ML software bias by 50% on average across three fairness metrics, outperforming the state-of-the-art with a 9% relative improvement.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) software automates various decision-making processes, significantly enhancing the efficiency of societal operations. However, the widespread adoption of ML software raises growing concerns about fairness, as such software often exhibits biases that disadvantage specific demographic groups or individuals. Since these biases typically stem from correlations between sensitive attributes and label within the training data, disrupting these correlations is a promising direction for fairness repair. Therefore, we introduce Fairabel, a novel approach that repairs fairness by mutating the training data under the guidance of causal models and multi-objective optimization. To evaluate Fairabel, we conduct an extensive empirical comparison against existing approaches across 40 decision-making scenarios. Our experimental results show that Fairabel reduces ML software bias by 50% on average across three fairness metrics, outperforming the state-of-the-art with a 9% relative improvement. Additionally, Fairabel surpasses the state-of-the-art by 1.5% on average across five performance metrics, demonstrating a superior ability to preserve software performance.
An example of its application in the legal field that explores the existing biases in models today is presented and it is hypothesized that the fairness criteria being evaluated cannot all three be satisfied simultaneously, leading to a machine learning model that remains unfair.
Keshav Pillutla, Kevin Fry· Journal of emerging investig...· 0 citations
The results show that ML data selection can hurt model fairness in a non-negligible number of cases, and compromise model utility in more than half of the cases, and provide interesting research directions for utility- and fairness-aware ML data selection.
Nawel Benarba, Zeyang Kong, Sara Bouchenak· IEEE Access· 1 citation
Results indicate that global feature importance, used as an active search signal rather than a post-hoc diagnostic, improves both the effectiveness and the efficiency of individual fairness testing.
H. Mamman, Abdullateef Oluwagbemiga Balogun, Mustapha Maidawa et al.· Journal of King Saud Univers...· 0 citations
This dissertation treats data bias as a first-class data management problem and develops principled frameworks for detecting and correcting it across the ML data lifecycle, introducing Uniform Bias (UB), an interpretable intersectional measure with formal guarantees, and an ILP-based mitigation framework that models co...
Over the past decade, Machine Learning (ML) has been trained under dual objectives: minimizing prediction error via Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) while controlling unfairness bias. In practice, however, fairness-aware training often yields limited improvements over standard ERM, making reliable post hoc auditing es...
Fairness assessment in algorithmic decisions that affect individuals, such as credit scoring, often relies on parity measures calculated at the aggregate group level. Such measures may not reveal which individuals experience unfairness or which explanatory factors contribute to it. In this paper, we propose a rank-base...
Dalia Atif, Paolo Giudici· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.