This first study that systematically investigates prompt injection attacks in a multi-agent LLM-based robotic system finds that attacks can propagate from one agent to others through shared prompt structures, with impacts varying depending on prompt composition and the targeted agent.
Abstract
Large language models are increasingly integrated into autonomous robotic systems for task planning and control, but this integration exposes them to prompt injection attacks that can lead to unsafe decisions and physical harm. Multi-agent settings increase the risks through cross-agent contamination and broader attack surfaces. In this paper, we evaluate prompt injection attacks against an LLM-based multi-agent robotic system, considering both direct injections into task instructions and indirect injections through perception modules. In our experiments across varying attack-goal complexities and injection strategies in both single-agent and multi-agent settings, we show that prompt injection can induce adversarial actions while reducing task completion. We find that attacks can propagate from one agent to others through shared prompt structures, with impacts varying depending on prompt composition and the targeted agent. We further analyze how architectural changes affect LLM queries and, consequently, the attack success. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically investigates prompt injection attacks in a multi-agent LLM-based robotic system.
General-purpose agents can plan, use tools, and revise their behavior from feedback, but it remains unclear whether these capabilities transfer from digital environments to embodied manipulation. To investigate this question, we introduce LIBERO-Agent, an agent-native benchmark for evaluating these agents in robot mani...
Zi-Jie Diao, Yi-Tong Chen, Si-Cheng Xie et al.· 0 citations
This work demonstrates that a general-purpose agent can directly drive a physical robot throughout task execution without any task-specific or environment-specific training and introduces Agent as Policy (AGP), which places task planning and execution under the agent's control.
Meng-Zhao Jia, Yang Lin, Xi-Xin Zhang et al.· 15 citations· ⚡1
Model-based control can directly execute specified objectives, while learning can amortize such behaviors into reactive policies, making their combination a natural solution to multi-stage manipulation. We introduce Semantically UNified (SUN) Programs, typed executables that compile grounded relations into aligned opti...
Wei-Qi Wang, Zhi Li, Yuliang Lei et al.· 0 citations
This paper investigates whether model's internal representations provide stronger signals of eventual task success in multi-turn agentic setups, and introduces two complementary methods: Latent Trajectory Dynamics (LTD) and the Action Representation Probe (ARP), which predicts success from representations formed at act...
Priyanka Mary Mammen, Emil Joswin, Srujananjali Medicherla· 0 citations
Multi-agent LLM systems are increasingly deployed for complex, long-horizon tasks or emerge as a natural consequence of agents interacting in the wild. Yet they give rise to significant safety and security risks: the flexible protocols that enable task generalization also expose novel threats, from cascading prompt inj...
Ben Hagag, William L. Anderson, S. Chakraborty et al.· 1 citation
Computer-use agents (CUAs) are agents powered by vision-language models (VLMs) that perceive a screen and operate an operating system through mouse, keyboard, and terminal interactions to automate everyday digital tasks. Their exposure to untrusted content creates a risk of indirect prompt injection (IPI), where an adv...
Chen Xiong, Zhi-Yuan He, Pin-Yu Chen et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.