Skip to content
Open access

When Artificial Intelligence Speaks For The Obstetrician: Multilingual Accuracy On Real Patient Questions

Aug 2026 · Hippocrates Medical Journal · 0 citations · 24 references

TL;DR

This study aimed to compare the response accuracy and reference quality of three free LLMs in Turkish and English using common pregnancy-related questions and found that Google Gemini and DeepSeek provided more accurate responses in English than in Turkish.

Abstract

BackgroundThe use of generative large language models (LLMs) in healthcare is rapidly increasing, offering easier access to medical information. However, comprehensive data on their multilingual accuracy and the reliability of cited scientific references remain limited. This study aimed to compare the response accuracy and reference quality of three free LLMs (ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DeepSeek) in Turkish and English using common pregnancy-related questions.MethodsIn this comparative observational study, 14 frequently asked pregnancy questions were posed to each LLM in Turkish and English, requesting responses supported by up-to-date scientific web sources. Answers were evaluated blindly by obstetricians and gynaecologists for accuracy. References were independently assessed for reliability, scientific validity, and accessibility. Statistical analyses were performed.ResultsLanguage and model infrastructure significantly influenced performance. Google Gemini and DeepSeek provided more accurate responses in English than in Turkish (p

Read PDF

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Evaluation of the accuracy and reproducibility of large language models (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini) in responding to patient-centered lipedema questions.

LLMs can provide generally accurate and consistent responses to patient-centered questions about lipedema, particularly in areas related to general information and diagnosis, however, reduced accuracy and reproducibility in complex clinical domains suggest that expert oversight is essential when using these tools for p...

Rabia Sanır, E. Türkmen, E. Giray et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Assessing the accuracy and usability of artificial intelligence-based language models in responding to common periodontal patient questions.

LLMs show variable performance in answering frequent periodontal patients' questions, influenced by model architecture, language, question type, and evaluative domain, and significant limitations remain particularly in Persian language output and in usability for patients with limited scientific literacy.

Sajad Jahantigh, R. Amid, A. Moscowchi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Accuracy and Readability of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Vascular Surgery Patients: A Specialist Based Evaluation Highlighting the Current Landscape of Safety Risks and Accessibility Gaps.

ChatGPT outputs related to vascular surgery were clear, but mostly clinically inappropriate and inaccurate, and required 13th grade reading skills, a serious patient safety concern for unsupervised patient education.

Mario D'Oria, W. Dorigo, V. Alexiou et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

HerHealthEval: Evaluating Multilingual and Register-Sensitive Understanding of Women's Health Communication

These findings show that robust multilingual healthcare evaluation requires explicit testing of register variation, uncertainty handling, and the provenance and invariance of adaptation labels.

Hassan Saeed Hassan Albattra, Mazen Bahgat, Rahatara Ferdousi et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Comparative evaluation of large language models in interpreting the scientific literature on intraoral scanners across varying input levels.

Evaluating the response accuracy of 2 advanced large language models found the Gemini-3.0 Flash responses excelled in highly structured, direct-response questions to relevance, clarity, and closeness to the article, whereas the ChatGPT-5.2 response demonstrated greater scientific accuracy at all levels and performed be...

Pranay Jain, F. R, A. V et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparative evaluation of ChatGPT and gemini responses to patient-oriented questions on breast cancer

ChatGPT’s higher scores and shorter, more focused responses indicate that it may be a more efficient tool for addressing breast cancer–related patient questions, and Gemini’s acceptable overall performance demonstrates acceptable overall performance.

Yeliz Yılmaz Bozok, N. Acar, M. Atahan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.