Aug 2026· Hippocrates Medical Journal· 0 citations· 24 references
TL;DR
This study aimed to compare the response accuracy and reference quality of three free LLMs in Turkish and English using common pregnancy-related questions and found that Google Gemini and DeepSeek provided more accurate responses in English than in Turkish.
Abstract
BackgroundThe use of generative large language models (LLMs) in healthcare is rapidly increasing, offering easier access to medical information. However, comprehensive data on their multilingual accuracy and the reliability of cited scientific references remain limited. This study aimed to compare the response accuracy and reference quality of three free LLMs (ChatGPT, Google Gemini, DeepSeek) in Turkish and English using common pregnancy-related questions.MethodsIn this comparative observational study, 14 frequently asked pregnancy questions were posed to each LLM in Turkish and English, requesting responses supported by up-to-date scientific web sources. Answers were evaluated blindly by obstetricians and gynaecologists for accuracy. References were independently assessed for reliability, scientific validity, and accessibility. Statistical analyses were performed.ResultsLanguage and model infrastructure significantly influenced performance. Google Gemini and DeepSeek provided more accurate responses in English than in Turkish (p
LLMs can provide generally accurate and consistent responses to patient-centered questions about lipedema, particularly in areas related to general information and diagnosis, however, reduced accuracy and reproducibility in complex clinical domains suggest that expert oversight is essential when using these tools for p...
Rabia Sanır, E. Türkmen, E. Giray et al.· Phlebology· 0 citations
LLMs show variable performance in answering frequent periodontal patients' questions, influenced by model architecture, language, question type, and evaluative domain, and significant limitations remain particularly in Persian language output and in usability for patients with limited scientific literacy.
Sajad Jahantigh, R. Amid, A. Moscowchi et al.· Clinical Advances in Periodo...· 0 citations
ChatGPT outputs related to vascular surgery were clear, but mostly clinically inappropriate and inaccurate, and required 13th grade reading skills, a serious patient safety concern for unsupervised patient education.
Mario D'Oria, W. Dorigo, V. Alexiou et al.· European Journal of Vascular...· 0 citations
These findings show that robust multilingual healthcare evaluation requires explicit testing of register variation, uncertainty handling, and the provenance and invariance of adaptation labels.
Evaluating the response accuracy of 2 advanced large language models found the Gemini-3.0 Flash responses excelled in highly structured, direct-response questions to relevance, clarity, and closeness to the article, whereas the ChatGPT-5.2 response demonstrated greater scientific accuracy at all levels and performed be...
Pranay Jain, F. R, A. V et al.· The Journal of prosthetic de...· 0 citations
ChatGPT’s higher scores and shorter, more focused responses indicate that it may be a more efficient tool for addressing breast cancer–related patient questions, and Gemini’s acceptable overall performance demonstrates acceptable overall performance.
Yeliz Yılmaz Bozok, N. Acar, M. Atahan et al.· PLoS ONE· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.