Skip to content
Preprint

EVADE: Evidence-Verified Agentic Diagnosis with Escape

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 26 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces EVADE (Evidence-Verified Agentic Diagnosis with Escape), an inferential, non-training method that enhances the safety of deploying a single frozen VLM by verifying gate consistency across different image views rather than re-reading the model's own text.

Abstract

Medical vision-language models (VLMs) can achieve high accuracy but remain unreliable: they are systematically overconfident, benefit little from test-time reasoning, and lack the ability to reliably calibrate trust in their own responses. We introduce EVADE (Evidence-Verified Agentic Diagnosis with Escape), an inferential, non-training method that enhances the safety of deploying a single frozen VLM. EVADE responds and, when uncertain, localises the region most diagnostically relevant, re-answers on a zoomed view, and commits only when both the entire image and the zoomed view responses agree; otherwise, it abstains. To directly address verification hallucination in single-model self-checking, our main idea is to verify gate consistency across different image views rather than re-reading the model's own text. Experimental evaluation on VQA-RAD, SLAKE, and PathVQA using Qwen2.5-VL-7B reports that EVADE is the only method that simultaneously improves both calibration and selective risk while maintaining accuracy, reducing expected calibration error (ECE) by up to 45% compared to zero-shot. Chain-of-thought, self-consistency, and self-verification all fail at least one axis. A grounding analysis reports that self-proposed regions perform better at diagnostic structure localisation than centres or random crops. However, a 7B VLM cannot use this localisation to revise answers. Therefore, reliability gains come from the consistency gate and calibrated abstention.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

EviSafe: Evidence-Grounded Safety Evaluation for Vision-Language Models

EviSafe is introduced, an evidence-grounded framework for VLM safety that jointly evaluates natural user-facing behavior, explicit grounding in textual and visual evidence, and behavioral sensitivity to counterfactual changes in safety-critical evidence.

Xuetong Li, Gaofeng Liu · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Knowing When Not to Answer: Abstention and Refusal Reasoning in Vision--Language Models

PARITY (Paired Assessment with Reused Identity), a synthetic, demographically balanced set of identity-controlled neutral/expression portrait pairs with neutral-neutral controls, is introduced, finding a clear split between refusal-first models and speculative models; in the latter, certain expressions disproportionate...

Karan Dua, Amit Agarwal, Hitesh Laxmichand Patel et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

The Mirage of Calibrated Confidence: Trajectory-Independence of Verbalized Confidence in Vision-Language Models

It is shown that confidence is insufficiently sensitive to what the reasoning trajectory actually contains, and that calibration training can paradoxically worsen this disconnect, and proposed TGS-Bench is a model-agnostic suite spanning 10 benchmarks with controlled good/bad trajectory pairs.

Jisoo Yang, Jaeho Han, T. Pham et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Decomposed Entailment for Factuality Checking and Hallucination Detection

HallDetect, a lightweight, reference-free, and black-box framework for hallucination detection, is presented, a lightweight, reference-free, and black-box framework for hallucination detection that is evaluated not only on summarization but across a broader range of source-grounded generation settings.

Achir Oukelmoun, N. Semmar, Gaël de Chalendar · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

SAVER: Selective Auditing of Verbal Evidence for Error Recovery in VLM Change Reasoning

SAVER (Selective Auditing of Verbal Evidence for Error Recovery), a lightweight, rule-based method that parses VLM responses for this evidence and triggers structured reprompting only when evidence is missing or inconsistent, significantly improves accuracy on tasks where errors stem from the model failing to articulat...

Youdi Li · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.