Skip to content
Review Open access

Recommendations for the use of clinical outcome assessments in rare disease drug development

Jul 2026 · EClinicalMedicine · Vol 98, pp. 104073 · 0 citations · 172 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The potential benefits of COAs, the key challenges, and recommendations to facilitate their effective and consistent integration in drug development for rare diseases are described and summarised.

Abstract

Summary There are over 10,000 rare diseases collectively affecting an estimated 250–450 million people globally. While these diseases are rare individually, their cumulative impact on patients, families, healthcare systems, and society is substantial. The incorporation of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) in clinical trials can facilitate patient-focused drug development and treatment evaluation by generating meaningful evidence on how patients feel and function. This work was conducted in three phases: a targeted literature review (searched Aug 2025; updated Feb 2026), a multistakeholder workshop (online, Sept 2025) and, finally, an online survey to ratify final recommendations (responses by March 3, 2026). Of 43 individuals invited, 35 (81%) attended the virtual workshop: 11 researchers (including clinical trialists); 12 patients/caregivers; seven industry experts; four individuals from regulatory agencies and one HTA expert. All were based in the UK or USA. Across three sessions, the workshop explored stakeholder perspectives on considerations and appropriate methodological approaches to COA assessment for rare disease drug development to facilitate the generation of recommendations for future use. A threshold of at least 70% votes was chosen, a priori, for inclusion in the final set of recommendations. Here, we describe the potential benefits of COAs, summarise the key challenges, and provide recommendations to facilitate their effective and consistent integration in drug development for rare diseases.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

CLINICAL DRUG DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA: MAPPING THE JOURNEY FROM DRUG DISCOVERY TO REGULATORY APPROVAL AND CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Background: A widening gap exists between Africa's share of the global disease burden and its participation in clinical pharmaceutical research. The continent shoulders approximately one quarter of all disease globally yet contributed fewer than two percent of clinical trials conducted worldwide in 2023. This review sy...

L. Barugahale, Agape Philipo Barugahale · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

62 Patient Experience with Clinical Trials: Results from the International Kidney Cancer Coalition Global Patient Survey

Abstract Background Clinical trials are essential for advancing cancer care, yet patient participation remains suboptimal worldwide. While structural and clinician-reported barriers are well described, patient perspectives across diverse geographic and socioeconomic settings are less understood. The International Kidne...

Eric Jonasch, S. de Cássio Zequi, A. Bex et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Clinical and regulatory acceptability of hierarchical composite endpoints in infectious disease clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES Hierarchical composite endpoints (HCEs) combine different clinical attributes in a single endpoint and establish a ranking of these components based on clinical importance. We studied the acceptance of HCEs in infectious disease clinical trials for clinical and regulatory decision-making. METHODS We conduc...

A. de Jong, Daphne S. A. Bennink, Selina Ehrenzeller et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Recommendations for generating real-world evidence with regulatory-grade relevance and reliability

A purpose-oriented framework clarifying the levels of relevance and reliability required according to specific regulatory objectives is proposed, and practical recommendations for generating regulatory-grade RWE that meaningfully informs regulatory decision-making while complementing conventional clinical trials are pr...

Yasutoshi Sakamoto, H. Bando, Yoshihiro Aoyagi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Should rare and ultrarare diseases be treated differently in health coverage decisions?

Health technology assessment (HTA) is widely used to inform coverage and reimbursement decisions in health systems by integrating evidence on clinical effectiveness, safety, cost-effectiveness, and broader social considerations. However, the application of conventional HTA frameworks to rare diseases remains chal...

L. Probst, Renata Cristina Ferreira Rola, Viviane Karoline da Silva Carvalho et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Safety reporting in chronic kidney disease clinical trials: a comparison of ClinicalTrials.gov registries and published reports

Transparent reporting of adverse events (AEs) is essential for evaluating the safety of interventions from chronic kidney disease (CKD), a population especially vulnerable to treatment-related harm because of polypharmacy, reduced renal clearance, and high comorbidity burden. Since 2007, the FDA Amendments Act (FDAAA 8...

Nevada Denton, Lydia Hashemi, Daniel Archer et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.