2026· Anais do Workshop em Engenharia de Requisitos· 0 citations
TL;DR
An industrial case is presented based on workshop transcripts and an exploratory exercise of how RE engineers derive goals, tasks, and quality concerns from the same textual input is conducted, suggesting that making interpretative reasoning explicit supports the reuse of elicitation data through requirements models.
Abstract
Elicitation activities such as workshops generate rich qualitative data; however their reuse in Requirements Engineering (RE) remains limited due to the lack of explicit structure and traceable interpretation. While modeling approaches such as i* and the NFR Framework define modeling constructs, they do not make explicit how model elements are derived from elicitation data. In this paper, we present an industrial case based on workshop transcripts and conduct an exploratory exercise of how RE engineers derive goals, tasks, and quality concerns from the same textual input. From a limited but representative sample, we identify recurring patterns in their interpretive reasoning and derive an initial set of heuristics that make this reasoning explicit. We further illustrate how these heuristics can be operationalized within a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipeline, enabling semantic and semi-automated processing grounded in RE engineers' interpretations while preserving traceability. Our results suggest that, in this exploratory setting, making interpretative reasoning explicit supports the reuse of elicitation data through requirements models.
Domain modeling is a knowledge-intensive activity that requires domain experts to iteratively refine abstract representations of their problem space. In practice, eliciting a complete and correct metamodel from textual descriptions expressed in natural language is error-prone and requires multiple human interactions be...
Zakaria Hachm, A. Pierantonio, Davide Di Ruscio et al.· Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE...· 0 citations
Software teams routinely sketch and draw informal diagrams to capture design intent, yet these artifacts rarely evolve into conformant models that automated tooling can process or that can support later stages of development. This tension motivates flexible modeling, which aims to bridge free-form sketching and canonic...
Cecilia Eklund, Tom Jonsson, Riccardo Rubei et al.· Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE...· 0 citations
The Assistant-Scribe-Knowledge Checker (ASK) framework for generating structured specification documents through guided interviews is evaluated in a consulting-firm setting where consultants are required to produce project “return-of-experience” documents to capture reusable knowledge.
Sylvain Roudiere, Bianca Lento· European Conference on Knowl...· 0 citations
This work presents the first cross-task empirical evaluation of LLMs spanning five RE-related activities, as well as replication materials supporting reproducibility, and a broader understanding of the capabilities, limitations, and practical readiness of current LLMs for RE.
Jacek Dabrowski, Manjeshwar Aniruddh Mallya, Alessio Ferrari et al.· 1 citation
Building a metamodel from a natural language domain description is hard to get right in a single shot and hard to correct once the artifact is complete. Existing generation tools also assume modeling expertise on the user side, leaving non-modeling experts unsupported. We present MetaLoop, a web-based tool that builds...
Zakaria Hachm· Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE...· 0 citations
This work proposes LLM-based methods for verifying semantically complex NL requirements on static GUI prototypes and introduces a multimodal LLM-based agent for verifying complex functional and non-functional requirements in dynamic GUI applications through automatically generated and evaluated interaction trajectories...
Kristian Kolthoff· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.