This work tested the hypothesis that classical force-field pre-relaxation can provide a more suitable starting geometry for subsequent UMLIP relaxation on a large database of high energy molecular crystals, and revealed distinct trade-offs among the evaluated models.
Abstract
Recent developments of universal machine learning interatomic potentials (UMLIPs) offer a fast route for screening molecular crystals based on geometry relaxation and energy ranking, but their reliability across chemically diverse energetic materials remains elusive. In particular, it is unclear whether or not these UMLIPs are over-sensitive to break the desired molecular connectivity for relaxing the periodic crystals. Herein we tested the hypothesis that classical force-field pre-relaxation can provide a more suitable starting geometry for subsequent UMLIP relaxation on a large database of high energy molecular crystals. Three models (MACE, MACE-OFF and UMA) in conjunction with the General Amber Force Field (GAFF) were applied to test this hypothesis. Among them, direct MACE-OFF and UMA showed very high relaxation success and preserved the reference geometries most closely, but they still exhibit failures for some rare cases. Using GAFF pre-relaxation can systematically reduce the number of failed relaxations with lower computational costs. Our comparative failure and robustness analyses revealed distinct trade-offs among the evaluated models. Among them, MACE-OFF achieves a better compromise between potential energy surface smoothness, structural fidelity, and stress convergence, serving as a good choice to provide a reliable foundation for automated structural optimization.
Pretrained machine-learning interatomic potentials, so-called universal or foundation models offer an appealing starting point for atomistic simulations, but their accuracy for material-specific observables often remains limited without additional reference data (fine-tuning). Here, we systematically quantify how much...
Machine-learned interatomic potentials trained across the periodic table have made atomistic simulation broadly accessible, and specializing them to a single compound class is widely expected to improve accuracy. Yet examples remain scarce, and fewer still surpass universal models in speed or reach a higher level of el...
Jonas Hänseroth, Rose von Stackelberg, Christian Dreßler· 0 citations
Foundation machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) deliver near-ab-initio accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost, yet their promise for Metal-organic Frameworks (MOFs) remains largely unrealized as large unit cells make first-principles training data expensive to generate, fine-tuned models are scarce...
T. J. Inizan, Prathami Divakar Kamath, Alin M. Elena et al.· 0 citations
The resulting MLIP/ShiftML3 workflow reduces computational costs by at least three orders of magnitude, making high-accuracy NMR crystallography accessible without HPC infrastructure, and opening the door to fast molecular dynamics simulations at the hybrid DFT level.
Shubha S. Gunaga, Rob Schurko, Sean T. Holmes et al.· Chemical Science· 3 citations
DensIP is introduced, a physics-based model of intermolecular interactions that uses machine-learned electron densities and only four universal parameters that outperforms state-of-the-art general-purpose MLFFs for long-range interactions and can be applied to molecules as large as drug ligands.
Dahvyd Wing, Mihail Bogojeski, Szabolcs Góger et al.· 1 citation
A hybrid symbolic-neural framework is introduced that unifies the interpretability of the Embedded Atom Method with the adaptability of data-driven learning, and derives a composite potential that surpasses the fidelity of its constituent models.
Bilvin Varughese, Aditya Koneru, Adil Muhammad et al.· PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.