Jul 2026· International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications· Vol 18, pp. 97-104· 0 citations
TL;DR
A synthesized architectural framework and comparative analysis is contributes a synthesized architectural framework and comparative analysis for migration program leaders and systems architects responsible for modernizing mission-critical legacy estates without compromising business continuity.
Abstract
Zero-downtime modernization has emerged as a foundational engineering strategy for enterprises migrating mission-critical legacy systems to cloud-native architectures while preserving uninterrupted operational continuity. Traditional approaches, system cutovers, planned maintenance outages, and large-scale rewrites concentrate operational risk in single, high-stakes events that expose transaction-intensive organizations to revenue loss, regulatory penalties, and customer attrition. This article examines the architectural strategies that collectively enable near-zero service disruption during complex legacy-to-cloud migrations. The four primary pillars analyzed are incremental service extraction through the strangler fig architectural pattern; cloud-native multi-region failover and horizontal scalability; real-time data consistency through change data capture (CDC) and event-driven architectures; and reliability through observability-driven automation and continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Evidence from practitioner programs demonstrates that structured zero-downtime strategies achieve rollback operations within two minutes through routing control, sub-second data synchronization through CDC pipelines, and migration-related defect reductions of 40 to 60 percent through automated quality gates. The article contributes a synthesized architectural framework and comparative analysis for migration program leaders and systems architects responsible for modernizing mission-critical legacy estates without compromising business continuity.
The HMCF addresses a structural gap in the modernization literature between generic cloud migration guidance and mainframe-specific replacement programs, providing a reference model for the large population of established financial institutions that will operate hybrid environments for a decade or more.
Narasimha Rao Vanaparthi, M. Dhanekula, Rishabh Srivastava· International journal of com...· 0 citations
-Cloud migration is often presented as an infrastructure relocation problem, yet enterprise continuity depends on a more difficult requirement: moving intertwined applications, databases, interfaces, identities, and operating practices without a user-visible service interruption. This review develops an evidence-inform...
Naga Srawan Kumar Pabba· Iconic research and engineer...· 0 citations
Modern enterprise cloud infrastructures need to be able to deliver software quickly, remain operationally resilient and follow strict regulatory requirements. Through traditional operations, observability, security and governance are typically treated as separate processes, which leads to longer Mean Time To Repair (MT...
Vishwa Lakhnakiya· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
Modern cloud-native software systems, including banking applications, cloud platforms, enterprise resource planning
architectures, and real-time online services, continuously produce large volumes of operational data such as application logs,
performance metrics, and system traces. Monitoring these systems using conven...
Vijaya Lakshmi G, A. S· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
Enterprise organizations are migrating mission-critical distributed systems from on-premises data centers to cloud platforms in pursuit of elastic scalability, reduced infrastructure overhead, and improved operational resilience. Zero-downtime migration of large-scale distributed enterprise applications, however, remai...
Deepanshu Kukreja· International journal of com...· 0 citations