It is observed that sparsification changes what it means to improve such a network, and a dual-branch spatial enhancement on the input of a progressive focused attention with a wavelet-domain modulation on its output is tested, forming SFMformer, which ranks first on 28 of 30 PSNR/SSIM entries across five benchmarks and three upscaling factors.
Abstract
Sparse attention mechanisms, which score all token pairs but propagate only the strongest, now underpin the most efficient Transformers for lightweight image super-resolution. This paper observes that sparsification changes what it means to improve such a network. A dense attention layer has one place where representation quality matters: the aggregation of attended features. A sparse layer has two, because the top-k operator first decides which tokens survive and only then decides what to do with them, and a token discarded at the selection stage cannot be recovered downstream. Selection quality and aggregation quality are therefore separable targets, addressed by modules placed before and after the attention respectively. We test this by pairing a dual-branch spatial enhancement on the input of a progressive focused attention with a wavelet-domain modulation on its output, forming SFMformer. Measuring each module alone and jointly over all fifteen benchmark-scale pairs, we find their gains are not additive: the joint gain exceeds the sum of the individual gains on nine pairs, and the sign of the discrepancy is predicted by how much the weaker module contributes on its own (r = -0.72), so the two compound when they relieve different constraints and overlap when they relieve the same one. Enabling spectral modulation once per block rather than once per layer retains the effect at roughly one-sixth of its cost, keeping the model below one million parameters at every scale. SFMformer ranks first on 28 of 30 PSNR/SSIM entries across five benchmarks and three upscaling factors. We report the cases where the pairing does not help, and deploy the model on a Raspberry Pi 5 to confirm the design is practical under tight resource budgets.
Image super-resolution (SR), which aims to reconstruct a high-resolution image from a low-resolution input, has progressed from convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to transformer-based architectures. Despite this progress, lightweight transformer SR remains challenging: local or window-based operations provide limited...
Face Super-Resolution (FSR) faces a critical challenge in balancing reconstruction quality with computational efficiency when deployed on resource-constrained devices. While existing methods leverage CNNs or transformers, they are constrained by limited receptive fields or high computational complexity. To achieve both...
Yun-Zhe Xu, Chen Zhao, Zhi-Zhou Chen et al.· IEEE Transactions on Image P...· 0 citations
Accurate stereo matching remains challenging in ill-posed regions such as fine structures, reflective, or transparent objects, where appearance cues are often ambiguous or unreliable. To tackle this, we propose PhasorNet, a lightweight yet powerful framework that boosts geometric discrimination via frequency-domain cue...
Md Raqib Khan, S. Vipparthi, Subrahmanyam Murala· 0 citations
Single image super-resolution aims to reconstruct high-resolution images from low-resolution inputs. This paper proposes FreeTransformSR, a novel lightweight super-resolution network based on a channel-wise free low-rank learnable transform. The transform learns task-adaptive basis functions in a data-driven manner, en...
A Cascaded Multi-Scale Feature Modulation (CMSFM) module, which progressively aggregates multi-scale contextual representations through cascaded feature modulation, and a Multi-Scale Variance-Guided Attention (MSVGA) module, which exploits feature variance as a lightweight statistical cue to capture the magnitude of lo...
Practitioners who must train a compact super-resolution model on a modest, domain-specific dataset with a single GPU are poorly served by benchmark leaderboards, because leaderboard rankings mix the effect of the architecture with the effects of training data, schedule and model capacity. This work separates those...
S. Shedthi B, Harshitha S. G., Aishwarya Rao et al.· Scientific Reports· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.