Aug 2026· Applied Informatics· Vol 7, pp. 324· 1 citation· 180 references
TL;DR
This Perspective examines the dual role of AI, considering it not only as an intelligent decision-support tool but also as a potential source of additional stress on physical infrastructure, and outlines a prospective roadmap encompassing lightweight emergency AI and computation–power-coordinated offloading mechanisms.
Abstract
The transition towards smart megacities has deeply integrated Artificial Intelligence (AI) with power–transport networks. While AI empowers complex operations like multi-network coordinated dispatch and emergency rescue, current algorithm-centric perspectives largely ignore its massive physical energy costs. Accordingly, this Perspective examines the dual role of AI, considering it not only as an intelligent decision-support tool but also as a potential source of additional stress on physical infrastructure. First, through a structured synthesis of the representative literature, we deconstruct the functional dependencies between algorithms and physical infrastructures, identifying how AI reshapes the operational paradigms of power, ground transport, and aerial networks under routine and emergency scenarios. We then introduce the concept of the “Computation–Energy Paradox.” Integrating conceptual analysis with a quantitative case study of a typical community, we illustrate a plausible failure mechanism: during extreme disasters, intensified AI invocation for emergency management generates surging computational loads, which paradoxically exacerbate power shortages and reduce the operating margin of already weakened systems. In addition, we analyze core engineering bottlenecks, including spatiotemporal computation–energy mismatches and physical constraints in extreme edge environments. To address these challenges, we outline a prospective roadmap encompassing lightweight emergency AI and computation–power-coordinated offloading mechanisms. Finally, the sustainable development of such systems suggests a paradigm shift: AI must evolve from a purely virtual algorithm into a physical component of an integrated compute–power–transport system.
The research examines how varying levels of AI transparency directly influence emergency responders’ decision-making during crises, exploring the delicate balance between operational openness and security considerations.
Jaideep Visave· Journal of Emergency Managem...· 0 citations
This article introduces S-AI-CITY, a domain-specific instantiation of the Sparse Artificial Intelligence (S-AI) paradigm for adaptive urban systems based on four complementary principles: activation parsimony, artificial hormonal orchestration, functionally specialized urban agents, and persistent symbolic memory.
S. Slaoui· International Journal of Art...· 1 citation
A comprehensive, Artificial Intelligence-driven framework for disaster management is proposed, which synthesizes state-of-the-art computational models with foundational hazard theories and culminates in a translational, highly scalable AI framework engineered for equitable, real-world deployment.
Risav Dey· International Journal For Mu...· 0 citations
Energy networks face a paradigm shift driven by renewable integration, uncertainty about required flexibility, distributed markets, and smart demand. Increasing asset interactions, cyber dependencies on communication and computation systems, and the deployment of AI agents demand a holistic, system-wide approach to und...
Climate change has significantly increased the severity of natural disasters, causing serious issues in telecommunication infrastructures when connectivity is most needed, especially for saving lives. Although current 4G and 5G networks integrate resilience procedures, such as infrastructure reinforcement and temporary...
Fatima Zahra Hassani Alaoui, J. El Abbadi· Transactions on Engineering...· 0 citations