This survey provides a unified analysis of how LLMs amplify web vulnerabilities across client-side, server-side, and pipeline layers while evaluating defenses and their limitations, and outlines future directions for secure AI-enabled web systems.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are becoming integral to web applications and browser agents, transforming online interactions while introducing new attack vectors and reshaping longstanding web vulnerabilities. Classical threats such as cross-site scripting (XSS) can be amplified through LLM-mediated interactions, while LLM-specific vulnerabilities can propagate across web applications, introducing attacks such as prompt injection. Securing modern web systems therefore requires understanding interactions between traditional and LLM-specific threats across the system lifecycle. Unlike prior surveys treating web and LLM security separately, this survey provides a unified analysis of how LLMs amplify web vulnerabilities across client-side, server-side, and pipeline layers while evaluating defenses and their limitations. The analysis examines extending NIST and ISO/IEC AI security frameworks to the security needs of LLM-enabled web environments. Three unresolved challenges are identified: adversarial natural-language instructions, autonomous agent security, and post-deployment security through continuous monitoring and adaptation. An LLM-aware monitoring and control framework is proposed, integrating semantic input validation, prompt integrity protection, output isolation, agent governance, and runtime monitoring. This unified perspective characterizes the evolving threat landscape and outlines future directions for secure AI-enabled web systems.
The adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) is changing how code is written, but the security implications of using LLMs to generate complete web API backends remain insufficiently characterized. Prior studies have assessed the security of LLM-generated code by detecting vulnerabilities in isolated code snippets; howe...
Abdul Ali Khan, S. Rauti, T. Mäkilä· IEEE Access· 0 citations
The increasing integration of large language models (LLMs) into systems introduces new attack surfaces that extend beyond traditional software vulnerabilities. While LLMs are commonly protected by prompt-level security mechanisms, recent researches show that these controls can be bypassed through carefully crafted inpu...
Tamás Girászi, Natália Papp, Norbert Oláh et al.· Proceedings of the 13th Inte...· 0 citations
This research evaluates how these threats have metastasized and traces the origins of modern security vectors to determine if established defensive protocols remain effective against increasingly complex modern exploitation tactics, and reveals a definitive and strategic maturation in adversarial approach.
Irene I. Eda, Jose Marcelito D. Brigoli, Teodoro B. Comayas et al.· Iconic research and engineer...· 0 citations
This work presents Language Model Security Modules (LMSM), a security framework that adapts the separation behind Linux Security Modules (LSM) to LLM serving and gives advances in interpretability and model-internal analysis a common path to runtime enforcement.
XiuYu Zhang, Bo-Nan Ruan, Jun-Feng Fang et al.· 0 citations
A four-layer taxonomy mapping 13 vulnerability types across perception, brain, action, and interaction layers is contributed, and seven open problems centered on containment are identified.
Md Jafrin Hossain, Mohammad Arif Hossain, Nirwan Ansari· 0 citations
This paper proposes SecureMCP, a policy-enforced framework that integrates Role-Based Access Control with an MCP server to establish multi-layer defense for LLM-generated SQL execution, and evaluates filter performance—false positive rate (FPR) and false negative rate (FNR))—separately from LLM generation quality.
Wonbae Kim, Hee-Kyong Yoo, Nammee Moon· Applied Sciences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.