It is argued that neurosymbolic AI architectures offer a promising research direction by combining neural learning from heterogeneous mobility data with symbolic representations of behavioral rules, network constraints, as well as accessibility, equity, and environmental objectives.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the way we study transport systems, yet its contribution to sustainable transportation planning remains uneven. While AI-based methods have shown strong performance in operational tasks such as traffic prediction and signal control, their integration into strategic planning is still fragmented. This paper provides a narrative review of AI applications in transportation planning and, more specifically, on-demand modeling, arguably the most challenging side of transport planning, and will focus on three arbitrary field macro-aggregations: machine learning (ML), artificial neural networks (ANN), and neurosymbolic AI (NeSy). The findings show that AI methods can improve predictive performance and capture complex nonlinear mobility patterns; however, predictive accuracy alone is insufficient for planning practice. Strategic planning requires models that are interpretable, transparent, and able to accommodate expert-defined constraints. The European Union AI Act further reinforces this requirement by classifying AI systems used in critical infrastructure, including road-traffic management, as high risk; this creates a regulatory need that many current AI applications do not yet satisfy. The paper argues that neurosymbolic AI architectures offer a promising research direction by combining neural learning from heterogeneous mobility data with symbolic representations of behavioral rules, network constraints, as well as accessibility, equity, and environmental objectives.
This review examines representative applications and key functionalities within each domain, highlighting how AI techniques—such as deep learning, graph-based models, reinforcement learning, and emerging foundation models—are adapted to diverse transportation contexts.
X. Chen, Jian-Jun Wu, Lu Zhen et al.· Engineering Management· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming mechanical engineering (ME) practice, influencing activities that range from modeling and simulation to optimization, diagnostics, design, and technical communication. This article consolidates perspectives discussed at a dedicated round-table during the 28th ABCM In...
Americo Cunha, C. Nataraj, Luciano M. Lorenzo et al.· Journal of the Brazilian Soc...· 0 citations
This article introduces S-AI-CITY, a domain-specific instantiation of the Sparse Artificial Intelligence (S-AI) paradigm for adaptive urban systems based on four complementary principles: activation parsimony, artificial hormonal orchestration, functionally specialized urban agents, and persistent symbolic memory.
S. Slaoui· International Journal of Art...· 1 citation
A data-driven Social-Cognitive Navigation Framework (SCNF) is proposed that improves navigation-level safety, efficiency, and interaction coordination while reducing unnecessary maneuvering-related operational demand.
Yu-Han Zhou, Hui-Jin Xu, Mao-Yuan Sun et al.· Frontiers in Marine Science· 0 citations
Urban mobility systems continued to be strained due to traffic disturbances, including congestion, accidents, and emissions, resulting in significant financial, economic, and safety losses. Especially for stochastic disruptions or unforeseen events, such as traffic anomalies caused by various traffic disturbances, acci...
G. Weidl, Kranthi Kumar Talluri· Proceedings of the Instituti...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.