2026· Journal of Communications· 0 citations· 97 references
TL;DR
A systematic literature review of the security aware software engineering frameworks for IoT systems proposed from 2018 to 2025, along with the definition of six dimensions in order to help with its classification and comparison, delivers a standardized structural foundation to guide subsequent investigations into security-by-design engineering workflows tailored for IoT software systems.
Abstract
—Internet of Things (IoT) environments are rapidly growing, which in turn has accelerated security threats that are often mitigated by re-activistic deployment-stage controls rather than actively embedded throughout the software development process. Although many other works suggest technical security solutions, little is understood about the process by which security is managed throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). This paper provides a systematic literature review of the security aware software engineering frameworks for IoT systems proposed from 2018 to 2025, along with the definition of six dimensions in order to help with its classification and comparison. This taxonomy is organized along six distinct dimensions: (i) phases of SDLC security integration, (ii) categorization of security frameworks, (iii) core security objectives, (iv) trust and adversarial threat premises, (v) contextual limitations imposed by IoT deployments, and (vi) standard of valibation procedures. Comparative analysis conducted via the proposed taxonomy reveals that most existing frameworks prioritize runtime security enforcement and authentication-focused protection targets, rely on implicit or centralized trust paradigms, and suffer from insufficient real-world verifiable validation. Derived from these analytical findings, we identify prominent research gaps spanning full-lifecycle embedded security integration, transparent, verifiable trust modeling, cross-domain framework portability, and repeatable experimental validation methodologies. Beyond its analytical utility, this taxonomy delivers a standardized structural foundation to guide subsequent investigations into security-by-design engineering workflows tailored for IoT software systems.
Researchers conducting SLRs in the IoT field are strongly encouraged to adopt TEFA(S) alongside updated PRISMA practices to improve the relevance, reliability, and generalizability of their SLRs.
Kavya Gupta, D. Tayal, Aarti Jain· SN Computer Science· 4 citations
It is argued that securing the IoT ecosystem requires sustained, coordinated effort from manufacturers, regulators and end-users, and where current technological and regulatory responses fall short of that goal is identified.
K. Curran, J. Kyle, Lovepreet Singh· Recent Progress in Science a...· 0 citations
The rapid growth of the digital ecosystem—driven by technologies such as 5G, cloud-native systems, edge computing, and the Internet of Things (IoT)—has introduced both significant opportunities and complex cybersecurity challenges. As modern networks become increasingly interconnected, traditional reactive security app...
A. Ogundipe· American Journal of Educatio...· 0 citations
Cloud computing and the Internet of Things (IoT) have emerged as transformative technologies
driving digital innovation across industries. Cloud computing offers scalable, on-demand
computing resources, while IoT interconnects billions of physical devices to generate real-time
data for intelligent decision-making. T...
Sali Mohammed Bobboi· WORLD JOURNAL OF INNOVATION...· 0 citations
The research underscores that including forensic readiness into BYOD policies not only protects data integrity and compliance but also bolsters business resilience against advancing cyber threats.
Kiran Basavaraja Malagi, Javed Wasim· International journal of com...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.