Constrained Hybrid Decoding (CHyD) is introduced, a novel faithfulness-first paradigm for speculative RAG that improves exact answer correctness and remains competitive overall, highlighting its suitability for safety-critical information retrieval applications.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used as interfaces for information retrieval, but they remain prone to hallucinations and faithfulness errors, in which the generated answers diverge from the retrieved evidence. While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and recent hybrid or semi-extractive approaches mitigate this issue, they do not guarantee that quoted or extracted spans are verbatim from the retrieved context. This limitation can have severe consequences in safety-critical domains, where answers must exactly match certified documentation. We introduce Constrained Hybrid Decoding (CHyD), a novel faithfulness-first paradigm for speculative RAG. While traditional speculative decoding is optimized for inference speed, CHyD repurposes this architecture to ensure faithful verbatim evidence extraction when the extraction mode is correctly triggered. Our approach enforces hard decoding constraints that restrict generation to continuous spans present in the retrieved documents. This design provides a robust but straightforward guarantee: any explicitly quoted span in the output appears verbatim in the provided context. We evaluate our method across state-of-the-art LLMs on diverse abstractive, extractive, and semi-extractive QA benchmarks, including technical datasets motivated by aircraft maintenance. Results show that existing hybrid methods frequently hallucinate quoted spans, with exact extraction accuracy dropping below 40% in technical domains. In contrast, our approach achieves near-perfect extraction faithfulness regardless of the model used. Although enforcing hard constraints introduces a trade-off with fluency-oriented metrics, our method improves exact answer correctness and remains competitive overall, highlighting its suitability for safety-critical information retrieval applications.
It is concluded that RAG should be viewed as a grounding and evidence-access mechanism rather than a guarantee of hallucination-free generation, and applications of RAG are outlined.
Shyalaja L. N., Shantinath Patil, P. R. et al.· International Journal for Re...· 0 citations
Intent-Guided Decoding (IGD) is proposed, a framework that arbitrates between retrieved context and parametric memory according to user intent and substantially improves factual recovery in RAG.
ToxicRAG is presented, a one-document-per-target attack that expresses misinformation as a coherent knowledge-update narrative that matches or exceeds the strongest evaluated baseline in every combination of dataset--model combinations.
Hao-Zhe Lu, Jia-Qiang Li, Xin-Yuan Zhu et al.· 0 citations
The proposed ReliableRAG is the first reliability-driven framework that mitigates deceptive misinformation in multi-hop QA through fine-grained evaluation of individual triples, and quantifies triple reliability by combining query-triple semantic relevance with triple credibility.
Jingjing Jiang, Xuan Wu, Wen-Hao Song et al.· 0 citations
This review treats RAG as a systems-engineering discipline, and concludes that retrieval quality, not generator choice, is what governs whether a RAG system can be trusted.
Balakrishna Sreeram· International journal of com...· 0 citations
The proposed architecture achieves double-digit improvements over a Naive RAG baseline across all four RAGAS metrics—Context Precision, Context Recall, Factual Correctness, and Faithfulness—with gains ranging from 13.10% to 28.15%; notably, Faithfulness surpasses 0.90 for Gemma-3-27B.
Alexandra V. Jove-Ticona, Luis J. Duarte-Coaquera, Israel N. Chaparro-Cruz et al.· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.