Skip to content
Review

Aligning Human-Agent Teamwork Plans with Human Factors in Time-Critical Decision Making

2026 · AHFE International · Vol 237 · 0 citations

TL;DR

An overview of key human factors relevant to HAT planning and corresponding planning guidelines are provided, which frame time not merely as an operational constraint but as a fundamental planning dimension for adaptive and resilient human–agent teamwork.

Abstract

Human–Agent Teamwork (HAT) in high-stakes, volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments places stringent demands on the planning of context-dependent and interdependent activities. Effective planning in such environments requires explicit consideration of temporal human factors that shape both individual and team performance over time. This paper provides an overview of key human factors relevant to HAT planning and derives corresponding planning guidelines. First, three temporal mechanisms are identified at the individual level: time pressure, stress, and the timing of decisions. Second, four mechanisms affecting teamwork processes are discussed: joint decision making, work process alignment, team resilience, and meaningful human control. Based on the literature analysis and expert workshops, support functions are proposed that explicitly account for these temporal mechanisms. The synthesis resulted in six actionable guidelines for HAT planning: (1) anticipation, (2) adaptive task allocation, (3) prepared routines, (4) adaptability of informing and performing, (5) trust calibration, and (6) continuous monitoring. Together, these guidelines frame time not merely as an operational constraint but as a fundamental planning dimension for adaptive and resilient human–agent teamwork.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Collaborative Decision-Making in Human-AI Versus Human-Human Teams: The Influence of Information Inquiry and Team Performance Expectations on Team Processes and Outcomes.

This study investigates whether decision-making processes in human-AI teams mirror those in human-only teams in a task where team members hold common and unique information and demonstrates how established decision-making paradigms can be adapted to incorporate AI.

Sophie Kerstan, G. Grote, Jan B. Schmutz · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Old Theories, New Teams: Advancing Team Adaptation Theory for Human-Autonomy-Teams

This work identifies four key conditions—predictability, observability, plannability, and directability—that govern how HATs respond to shifting interdependencies and proposes a holistic framework that integrates the dynamic interplay between team members, tasks, and the environment.

Tilman Nols, Anna‐Sophie Ulfert, J. Gevers · 0 citations
Sep 2026

A Conceptual Framework for Coordination in Human-Automated Vehicle (AV) Teaming: Structural Dimensions and Implications

Human-automated vehicle (AV) interaction can be understood as a form of teaming because safe driving often depends on coordinated contributions from both the driver and automation. Although AVs are often framed as reducing human involvement, many dynamic scenarios still require drivers and automated systems to coordina...

Jing Zang, Brandon J. Pitts · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Working with Agentic `Teammates': When a New Organizational Actor Collides with the Human Ecosystem of Work

An in-situ qualitative study of a persistent, proactive AI agent'teammate'deployed across multiple teams in a large technology company reveals the boundaries of the human-agent workplace are actively in flux, triggering breakdowns and negotiations.

Rida Qadri, Remi Denton, Michael A. Madaio et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.