Sep 2026· Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting· 0 citations· 12 references
TL;DR
It is essential to calibrate trust in machine teammates, design workload-sensitive and context-aware transparency mechanisms, and develop communication protocols that support resilient human-machine team performance in space.
Abstract
Future missions to the International Space Station, the Moon, and Mars will require teams to live and work in extreme environments, facing heavy workload, isolation, uncertainty, communication delays, and limited ground support. These conditions degrade sensing, perception, decision-making, and action. As machines are increasingly integrated into such missions, human-machine teams must adapt to maintain safety and performance under extreme conditions. This systematic review examines the state of research on human-machine teaming in space. Three databases—Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science—were searched. Eight peer-reviewed articles met all inclusion criteria. They examined trust, explainability, performance, and communication. The key outcomes emphasize communication challenges, exacerbated by non-resilient teams. Trust and performance perceptions differ between novices in simulations and experts in operational settings. It is essential to calibrate trust in machine teammates, design workload-sensitive and context-aware transparency mechanisms, and develop communication protocols that support resilient human-machine team performance in space.
A Personality Gap Model (PGM), based on Jung’s functions-attitude is proposed to characterize trust under Partial Mission Capable (PMC) status, thereby augmenting a Trust Calibration Space (TCS) for designing trust-aware interventions.
Angelo Compierchio, P. Tretten, P. Illankoon· Safety· 0 citations
It is argued that agentic AI should be approached as a socio-technical design problem, where interfaces, oversight mechanisms, and evaluation practices are as critical as algorithms.
Timothy Merritt, Alejandro Jarabo-Peñas, Juan Bravo-Arrabal et al.· 0 citations
Industry 5.0 (I5.0) repositions manufacturing around a human-centric vision in which cyber-physical systems must adapt to the worker rather than the other way around. Despite significant advances in worker state monitoring technologies, including markerless computer vision, wearable physiological sensors, and machine-l...
Lara Pereira, Luís Miguel D. F. Ferreira, J. Paulo· 0 citations
Autonomous operations in nuclear power involve complex human factors challenges. This is because the industry has been held to a high standard for safety due to a combination of consequence and public perception of risk and consequence. In industries like manufacturing and transportation, the risks associated with auto...
Anna Hall, Casey R. Kovesdi, Katya L. Le Blanc et al.· Proceedings of the Human Fac...· 0 citations
Both aviation and spaceflight environments are approaching inflection points in the development of new systems capabilities and mission operations profiles affecting human operators in both ground-based and crewmember operations. Operational hazards such as environmental conditions and other aerospace entities (includ...
B. Caldwell, Reem Khir, Koki Ho et al.· IISE Annual Conference &...· 0 citations
An expert panel, spanning robotics, human-robot interaction, safety, and economics, systematically developed and refined an evaluation concept to analyze the transition from laboratory prototypes to operational systems.
Raphael Memmesheimer, Martina Overbeck, Dominik Beyer et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.