Human personality theories characterize traits not as isolated attributes captured by a single score, but as stable individual tendencies expressed through the interplay among persons, situations, and behaviors. Existing studies of personality-related behavior in LLMs have primarily focused on outputs elicited under personality conditioning, characterizing observable trait-related expressions while lacking mechanistic evidence for the existence of internal personality-related representations, their cross-situational expression, and how these representations shape specific behaviors. Building on Funder's personality triad framework, we adapt its three components for LLM analysis: Person as personality-related internal representations, Situation as contexts that afford trait-relevant responses, and Behavior as response patterns on broader social tasks. We introduce a framework for discovering, controlling, and validating trait-like representations in LLMs. First, using contrastive behavior pairs grounded in shared situations, we identify sparse internal features associated with opposing poles of personality traits through SAE decomposition. We validate their trait relevance through effects on behavior to situation, token-level activation patterns, and robustness to paraphrasing. Second, feature-level interventions induce bidirectional trait-related shifts across a separate, diverse set of situations while preserving response validity, demonstrating consistent expression across contexts. Third, applying the same interventions to social intelligence tasks reveals behavioral changes with benefit-tradeoff patterns consistent with findings from human personality research, providing behavioral-level validation beyond personality scores. Our findings provide evidence that LLMs contain controllable trait-like representations linking internal states, situational expression, and behavioral outcomes.
Current approaches to evaluating personality in large language models (LLMs) typically prompt them to self-report on psychological questionnaires such as the Big Five Inventory. However, these methods assess introspective labels rather than observable behavior, despite the fact that LLMs are deployed to act in realisti...
Tao Pu, He-Xi Wang, Ze-Yang Liu et al.· Proceedings of the Thirty-Fi...· 0 citations
A century of psychology has found that the trait words people use to describe one another vary, but the relational structure among those traits, which ones go together and which oppose, is strikingly consistent across raters and cultures. We test whether the LLM (Qwen 2.5-7B-Instruct) reproduces this structure in its i...
Yi-Lin Geng, Omri Abend, Eduard H. Hovy et al.· 0 citations
Large language models are increasingly used to simulate human participants in social and behavioral studies, yet static persona prompting typically maps a participant profile and an experimental scenario directly to a response, entangling stable dispositions with situation-specific interpretations. To address this limi...
Zhi-Bo Deng, Dong-Yuan Li, Shu-Wen Ge et al.· 0 citations
This work proposes A-B-D to infer traits bottom-up from behavioral data (B-data), namely how agents act on their environment and communicate with users, as recorded in existing trajectories, and offers a new lens for understanding AI personality.
Hao-Kai Zhao, Jie Gao, Yunze Xiao et al.· 0 citations
Introduction Personality traits represent consistent patterns of expressions in an individual’s cognition, behaviour and emotion and are therefore relevant to psychopathology and present markers for psychological vulnerability. The S-REF model has implications for personality and trait theory because it describes highe...
Henrik Nordahl, F. Anyan, O. Hjemdal et al.· Frontiers in Psychiatry· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.