Skip to content
Preprint

OT-FairBoost: Optimal Transport-Guided Gradient Boosting for Fairness Regularization on Tabular Data

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 54 references
Mathematics

TL;DR

OT-FairBoost is introduced, a novel in-processing framework that incorporates a Wasserstein-2 distance penalty directly into the objective function of gradient-boosted trees to efficiently optimize group fairness criteria such as Demographic Parity and Equalized Odds on neural-based predictions.

Abstract

Although neural-based machine learning models have received a lot of attention recently, tree-based models such as gradient boosting are competitive for tabular data and therefore remain widely used in various applications of AI. As when using other machine learning predictive models, they can however yield discriminative predictions across demographic groups, due to so-called algorithmic biases. These undesirable phenomena have motivated the emergence of new regulatory frameworks and various AI fairness strategies. While several pre-and post-processing methodologies exist to mitigate such bias on gradient boosting models, only a few in-processing methods have been proposed. To bridge this gap, we introduce OT-FairBoost, a novel in-processing framework that incorporates a Wasserstein-2 distance penalty directly into the objective function of gradient-boosted trees. This OT-based mitigation strategy has been shown to efficiently optimize group fairness criteria such as Demographic Parity and Equalized Odds on neural-based predictions. To adapt this approach for gradient boosting, we extend the sample-wise gradient estimation of the Wasserstein-2 distance between group predictions to discrete distributions and hessian diagonals. We then integrate our approach into the LightGBM training procedure and evaluate it across binary classification, regression, and multi-group sensitive attribute settings. Experimental results in each of these settings demonstrate that OT-FairBoost achieves best accuracy-fairness trade-offs against alternatives.

View source

Similar papers

Conference 2023

Fairness and Accuracy Under Domain Generalization

This paper develops theoretical bounds on the unfairness and expected loss at deployment, and derives sufficient conditions under which fairness and accuracy can be perfectly transferred via invariant representation learning, and designs a learning algorithm such that fair ML models learned with training data still hav...

Thai-Hoang Pham, Xue-Ru Zhang, Ping Zhang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Fairness-Aware Mixture-of-Experts via Subgroup Reweighting and Gate Regularization

This work identifies routing-induced bias, a failure mode in which subgroup imbalance drives the gating network to route subgroups onto a few experts, and proposes an end-to-end Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that corrects it and improves fairness while maintaining competitive predictive performance.

Sunhee Hwang · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Metropolis-Hastings Dominates Importance Resampling for Policy Composition

Post-training a large language model (LLM) often requires exploring trade-offs between multiple rewards, but retraining for each trade-off is expensive. Decoding-time policy composition allows these trade-offs to be adjusted by combining reward-specific policies at inference time. This composition targets a weighted pr...

A. Kurennoy, R. Yarullin, Fergal Reid · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

MaD-RL: Matching Distributions for Calibrating LLMs with Reinforcement Learning

This work proposes a general RL-based framework for Distribution Matching allowing matching the distribution of a latent categorical attribute of model outputs to a specified target distribution and proposes reward functions for other divergences such as KL and Jensen-Shannon and motivate them with theoretical justific...

Sourabh Kulkarni, Ksheeraj Sai Vepuri, B. Demir et al. · 0 citations
Open access Dec 2024

Fair distributed machine learning with imbalanced data as a Stackelberg evolutionary game

Decentralised machine learning systems trained on heterogeneous and imbalanced data face a fundamental tension between predictive performance and equitable contribution across participating nodes. Here, we introduce two contribution-weighting mechanisms inspired by the principles of Stackelberg evolutionary games: the...

S. Niehaus, Ingo Roeder, N. Scherf · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Understanding the impossibility of machine learning fairness with data examples

An example of its application in the legal field that explores the existing biases in models today is presented and it is hypothesized that the fairness criteria being evaluated cannot all three be satisfied simultaneously, leading to a machine learning model that remains unfair.

Keshav Pillutla, Kevin Fry · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.