This work proposes Select-ANd-Extract (SANE), a simple yet effective plugin for RAG that performs blueprint-guided query-time evidence extraction, which allows the generator LM to use only compact and structured key information so that it can perform better reasoning.
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for language model (LM) systems fundamentally has two failure modes: retrieval failure and reading failure. The former fails to recall the right pieces of information from the external corpus, and the latter fails to produce the correct answer although the right information is retrieved. Some methods perform structured indexing for retrieval failure, but may suffer from limited generalization of the fixed structures. Some methods perform query-time structuring for reading failure, but typically require a lot of LM calls and rely heavily on the LM's capability. To this end, we propose Select-ANd-Extract (SANE), a simple yet effective plugin for RAG. For the retrieval failure, we retrieve a wide set of candidates with a semantic retriever, and leverage the LM to select the top candidates based on their synopses, which yields better recall than the original retriever. For the reading failure, we perform blueprint-guided query-time evidence extraction, which allows the generator LM to use only compact and structured key information so that it can perform better reasoning. Empirical results confirm that SANE brings solid improvements, while only introducing modest extra overhead. As a lightweight plugin for RAG, SANE offers a simple alternative to heavier approaches, and suggests a high-performance RAG framework need not be overly complex.
A systematic comparison of retrieval strategies for candidate generation under a shared LLM-based selection stage, combining sparse retrieval (BM25), Web KB search, and a state-of-the-art trained dense retriever with several open- and closed-source LLMs is presented.
Fina Polat, Daniel Daza, Pengyu Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has attracted significant attention for enhancing large language models (LLMs) in domain-specific and knowledge-intensive tasks by utilizing external documents retrieved by retrievers. However, LLMs often struggle to determine which retrieved documents are relevant and how they rela...
Fu-Da Ye, Shuang-Yin Li, Yong-Qi Zhang et al.· ACM Transactions on Knowledg...· 0 citations
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines typically rely on a fixed indexing and retrieval configuration determined at preprocessing time. This one-size-fits-all design is ill-suited to domain-expert settings, where heterogeneous queries require different chunking granularities, metadata constraints, and source-se...
Aurélien Pellet, Julien Perez, Marie Puren· 0 citations
We study retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for questions about French PDF documents when both the answer and its supporting document pages are evaluated. Five system variants add dense retrieval, rank fusion, reranking, and query decomposition to a BM25 baseline. On 595 challenge questions, the complete system score...
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) for code generation has been studied extensively on public repositories, where a model's parametric knowledge often compensates for imperfect retrieval. This breaks down in enterprise codebases, where private APIs, internal frameworks, and undocumented team conventions fall entirely...
Document retrieval increasingly supports high-stakes information access in finance, healthcare, and law. Modern retrieval pipelines vary both in modality (text or multimodal) and in retrieval architecture (dense or late-interaction). These choices impose a hard compromise: the most effective pipelines are too slow and...
Emre Kuru, Mehmet Onur Keskin, R. Farahbakhsh et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.