A new semantics for CQE is introduced, based on the notion of minimal policy violation (MPV), and it is shown that the new semantics provides a sound approximation of the previous ones, while satisfying the indistinguishability property.
Abstract
We study Controlled Query Evaluation (CQE), a declarative approach to confidentiality-preserving data access, in the context of Description Logic (DL) ontologies, and for confidentiality policies expressed through Epistemic Dependencies (EDs). We first address the problem of answering queries (specifically, Boolean unions of conjunctive queries) under known semantics for CQE (GA- and IGA-entailment). Our results show that if the TBox is expressed in $\text{DL-Lite}_{\mathcal{R}}$, CQE is computationally intractable in general. Moreover, in the presence of EDs, the IGA semantics has recently been proven not to satisfy an important confidentiality preservation property known as indistinguishability. With the goal of defining computationally easier and confidentiality-preserving forms of CQE, we introduce a new semantics for CQE, based on the notion of minimal policy violation (MPV). We show that the new semantics provides a sound approximation of the previous ones, while satisfying the indistinguishability property. We also prove that, in the case of $\text{DL-Lite}_{\mathcal{R}}$ ontologies, query entailment under the MPV semantics can be decided in polynomial time in data complexity. Finally, we present a software implementation of our framework that we used to evaluate the feasibility of this new approach using an existing benchmark for OWL 2 QL.
This work constructs a rewriting which takes as input both shapes and an OWL EL$^-$ ontology -- a fragment of OWL EL restricting the usage of existential restrictions -- and produces SHACL constraints, providing a powerful tool which simplifies combining reasoning with validation.
Anouk Oudshoorn, Piotr Gorczyca, D. Arndt· 0 citations
This paper explores how reasoning over DL terminologies can be captured in argumentative terms, by establishing a translation into Assumption-Based Argumentation (ABA), a rule-based formalism comprising defeasible assumptions, where argumentation semantics are used to retrieve sets of jointly acceptable assumptions.
Giovanni Buraglio, Federica Di, M. Šimkus· 0 citations
Experiments show that precision improves by filtering invalid candidates, while recall is preserved due to retaining candidates whose constraints are not explicitly violated, and a three-valued constraint semantics that avoids incorrect rejections under open-world assumptions.
Emanuel Kitzelmann· Deutsche Jahrestagung für Kü...· 0 citations
MGQL is presented, the first mechanized, small-step operational semantics for a substantial read-only fragment of GQL that is grounded in the ISO/IEC 39075 standard, and it is proved that the type system is sound, ensuring an end-to-end guarantee of well-formed queries yielding results that conform to their declared sc...
Aditya Thimmaiah, Tong-Tong Lin, Milos Gligoric· Proceedings of the ACM on Pr...· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.