The review synthesizes the performance improvements, operational efficiencies, and strategic advantages that stem from Q4.0 initiatives, providing a structured foundation for future research examining the strategic impact of digital quality management.
The rapid expansion of research on Quality 4.0 (Q4.0) reflects its increasing strategic relevance in the era of digital transformation. While prior studies have explored various implementation aspects, there remains a need for a more integrated understanding of the tangible benefits organizations gain through successful adoption. Existing contributions remain dispersed across disciplines, making it difficult to quantify the multifaceted outcomes of this transition. Therefore, this study aims to systematize the primary benefits and value-added outcomes resulting from Q4.0 implementation. A systematic literature review was conducted, analyzing empirical research papers published between 2017 and 2025 retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases. The review synthesizes the performance improvements, operational efficiencies, and strategic advantages that stem from Q4.0 initiatives. The findings provide a structured foundation for future research examining the strategic impact of digital quality management. Based on the results, executives, shareholders, and quality professionals can better evaluate the value proposition of Q4.0 and align digital initiatives with long-term organizational objectives.
Karolina Šūmakarienė, Renata Korsakienė· International Scientific Con...· 1 citation
The surge in research publications surrounding Quality 4.0 underscores the field’s growing significance. However, while the digitalization of quality management has been widely discussed, there remains a notable scarcity of in-depth research regarding the specific barriers and success factors for implementation. The existing investigations remain fragmented, indicating the need for more consolidated research. Thus, this study aims to systemize the main barriers and the success factors for effective implementation of Quality 4.0. A systematic literature review was conducted. A total of 18 empirical research papers published from 2017 to 2025 from Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases were reviewed using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study provides a structured synthesis of the barriers and success factors identified in the implementation of Quality 4.0. The findings contribute to future research on factors influencing Quality 4.0 adoption and offer insights for stakeholders. Specifically, the results can support decision-makers in assessing implementation readiness by identifying potential barriers and evaluating whether critical success factors are in place.
Karolina Šūmakarienė, Renata Korsakienė· International Scientific Con...· 0 citations
Key findings show that organisational readiness and maturity are decisive predictors of transformation success, while leadership commitment, cultural alignment, and business process management act as crucial enablers.
Misheck Musaigwa, Fulufhelo Netswera· International Journal of App...· 0 citations
Purpose | The purpose of the paper is to assess the economic effects of implementing or modifying onboarding processes for blue-collar workers and to incorporate data derived from non-academic (grey) literature into empirical analysis from the management and economics perspective. Research method | The study was based on a content analysis of twelve case studies from 2015–2025, using the Multivocal Literature Review method within a desk research approach. Eighteen onboarding practices were identified, coded, and examined through point-biserial correlation coefficients between specific practices and economic outcomes. Results | The analysis revealed that the highest economic effectiveness is achieved by onboarding programs combining digitalization with structured developmental and communicational support. Such configurations lead to higher retention, faster productivity gains, and reduced administrative workload in HR. Isolated procedural actions produced limited or inconsistent results, emphasizing the need for integrated, comprehensive adaptation programs. However, the study is limited by the relatively small sample size and the lack of standardized financial data. Originality / value / implications / recommendations | The study’s value lies in iden tifying the most effective configurations of onboarding practices from an organizational economic performance perspective. The proposed IDTS model may serve as a practical tool for HR managers, while the findings highlight the need for further standardization of economic measures and comparative research across organizational contexts.
