It is argued that data citation for large language models is an open challenge, distinct from document-level citation grounding and harder to solve.
Abstract
Large language models increasingly mediate access to information, and a growing body of work asks whether they cite the sources behind their outputs. That work treats citation as a verification device and applies it to textual documents. Scholarly citation serves two further functions, credit and provenance, and it applies to data as much as to text. This paper argues that data citation for large language models is an open challenge, distinct from document-level citation grounding and harder to solve. We ask how such models should cite data so that outputs stay verifiable, provenance stays traceable, and credit reaches data creators and curators. We set out three research directions. Training data attribution has to turn influence estimates into references for corpora absorbed into model parameters. Data citation at inference time has to identify datasets, subsets, and query results at the right granularity and fixity. Citing knowledge graph facts has to define what a reference to a single triple denotes and how credit propagates along provenance. Progress on all three depends on joint work across the database, information retrieval, knowledge representation, and artificial intelligence communities.
This project seeks to create the infrastructure needed to make legal citation in OpenJustice rigorous and transparent through various enhancements to the extraction and connection of case metadata, and fully integrating the resulting citation graph into the reranker, maximizing LLM reasoning capabilities.
This work introduces SciDocBench, a workflow-centered benchmark targeting capability diagnosis with verifiable training-data construction for scientific-document assistants, and SciDocIR, a structured representation of scientific document objects, layout and cross-reference relations, and provenance.
Shen-Xi Wu, Yu-Hong Liu, Hao-Song Zhang et al.· 1 citation
This work introduces DocCite, to its knowledge the first benchmark for systems that verify and correct page-level citations in document images, and proposes AtomCite, an agentic framework that parses an answer into claims, checks each claim against the image of its cited page, and applies a deterministic repair policy.
Chen Qian, Yi-Meng Wang, Yu Chen et al.· 0 citations
Citation analysis has traditionally been organized around citation intent, function, stance, citation context analysis, and cited text span identification. Recent large language models (LLMs) have been applied to these tasks through prompting, in-context learning, fine-tuning, annotation assistance, and retrieval-augme...
Shu-Qiao Yang, Xiao-Lei Ma, Ping He· International Journal of Eng...· 0 citations
Analysis of a large-scale dataset covering 234,073 research papers published between 2019 and 2025 suggests that AI-assisted writing confers a modest but systematic advantage in visibility and discoverability that translates into higher measured impact.
S. Paklina, P. Parshakov, Elena Rapoport· Scientometrics· 0 citations
This work improves evidence retrieval by combining semantic ranking and repository-specific identifier pattern matching and achieves recall close to that of proprietary models while reducing estimated inference cost by 330× to 1,300×, although with lower precision.
Pietro Marini, M. Peters, Nicole Contaxis et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.